[Devel] Callling add_rr_param from failure_route[x]

Dmitry Isakbayev isakdim at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 16:56:01 CEST 2005


Hi Bogdan,

What about calling "add_rr_param" from a per-branch route?

Thanks,
Dmitry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim at gmail.com>
Cc: <devel at openser.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Devel] Callling add_rr_param from failure_route[x]


> Hi Dimitry,
> 
> for the moment "add_rr_param" cannot be called from failure route due 
> implementation limitations - to be able to add params after the RR was 
> inserted, a pointer to the lump is kept in a static variable; when 
> adding params, the lump body is modified.
> In failure route there are tow problems:
>    1) you cannot use anymore the static variable to identify the RR 
> lump; maybe a solution will be to set type for the RR lumps and try to 
> find them;
>    2) altering a lump from shm mem is very problematic - all of them 
> are allocated in a single mem chunk; no idea how to go around 
> this.....for the moment.....
> 
> but this is on my TODO list :)
> 
> regards,
> bogdan
> 
> Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the reason for not allowing to call "add_rr_param" from a 
>> failure_route block?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>



More information about the Devel mailing list