[Devel] Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release

[Jan Janak]

There is such a bug tracking system running at

http://bugs.sip-router.org

It is powered by Jira and is quite easy to use. I announced it to serdev
mailing list some time ago but there seemed to be no interest, from
core developers only myself and Andrei created accounts. I was using it
for a while and I find it easy to use and convenient.

  Jan.

On 15-06-2005 14:24, info at beeplove.com wrote:
> I agree with you.
> We should have proper bug tracking system, including feature request.
> 
> MOhammad
> 
> 
> 
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Giudice, Salvatore Salvatore.Giudice at FMR.COM
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:12:15 -0400
> To: daniel at voice-system.ro, andrei at iptel.org, serdev at iptel.org,
> serusers at iptel.org, devel at openser.org, users at openser.org
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] OpenSER release
> 
> 
> I am not an advocate for either ser or openser, but I would like to
> comment.
> 
> Is openser going to be equipped with a forum/ticket system where people
> can document bugs, feature requests, etc (non-configuration issues)? 
> 
> This is just my observation and you may not agree, but I believe this
> project could be much better maintained if it used a more structured
> ticketing style system to manage development issues instead of the
> current mailing lists. In my experience, mailing lists like this foster
> a terrible user experience where many development issues can go on
> without response.
> 
> Ideally, if there was a mailing list to address user issues and
> ticketing system like the one Digium uses to manage Asterisk, I think
> everyone would benefit by being better informed and ser would ultimately
> be a better product for it. How many people out there feel that their
> issues have fallen through the cracks in the past couple years?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel at voice-system.ro] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:28 AM
> To: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> Cc: SER developer mailing list; serusers; users at openser.org;
> devel at openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release
> 
> On 06/14/05 23:21, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> 
> >On Jun 14, 2005 at 22:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <daniel at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >  
> >
> >>It is your opinion, but I repeat myself, that the SER code maintained
> by 
> >>us will go further -- I don't think that someone can claim that we 
> >>didn't do the job for our code (the only discrepancy is some
> last-minute 
> >>adds in xlog (to print avps) - will be committed on unstable very soon
> 
> >>with the new color patch). The cvs was created just to ease the 
> >>maintainance. The patches would be a nightmare.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Maybe I've misunderstood you: is this only a parallel "stabilized"
> >version + some features or is it a full fork (do you intend to fork
> >unstable also)?
> >  
> >
> It is fork for the code that we changed (acc module, usrloc module ...),
> 
> in the future may be other that they do not find the path in SER. We 
> will maintain and upgrade our part of code from SER continuously.
> 
> >I have no problem with another stable version, what worries me is
> >fragmenting the development for unstable (which is the place where
> major
> >changes are made).
> >  
> >
> I see no fragmenting there -- the situation is the same for SER as it 
> was before. For example, there is no fragment for acc module, it will be
> 
> maintained by who did it till now, adding what he considers necessary 
> there. But we came to meet a lot of requests of why the acc patch is not
> 
> included in the CVS (it was fully backward compatible and had new 
> features requested by many SER users) and we want to promote _more open_
> 
> approach to contributions to all parts of code. The acc patch was sent 
> on November 1, 2004. No real response (neither negative, nor positive) 
> from maintainer to the submission since then ... are you aware of a good
> 
> reason?!?! ... should we wait just about (or more) half an year for each
> 
> contribution?!? I will not do that anymore!!!
> 
> Daniel
> 
> >
> >Andrei
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers