[Devel] need a way to check if transaction has been cancelled
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu Aug 25 20:12:26 CEST 2005
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Juha,
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> i have come to the conclusion that the easiest way to solve the
>> canceling problem that klaus reported is to have a function,
>> e.g. t_check_cancel(), that can be called in failure route and tells if
>> the transaction in question has been canceled by the uac.
sounds simple and sufficient
> fair enough...I would say
> just looking at the reply codes (both UAS and UAC), not sure if you make
> distinction between a cancelled call due caller or local
> timeout......so, let's go for this option.
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but there is of course
difference between local timeout and caller cancels:
- local timeout: failure route for voicemail, sequential forking ...
- caller cancels: no further handling
>> this way failure route would know to do nothing even if min reply code
>> from the branches would be something else than 487.
>> bogdan, is this function hard to implement?
> I will have to dig a little bit and come back with an answer.
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openser.org
More information about the Devel