30 Oct
2008
30 Oct
'08
12:10 a.m.
Guys,
When attempting to pass REGISTER requests up stream I get the following
error messages on the console (below). This also brings up the question of
"what is the best way to simply pass REGISTER requests on to an upstream
registrar?"
Thanks for the help.
-Daniel
REGISTER: NATed client, enabling NAT
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:59 [48175] CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response: pick_branch
failed (lowest==-1) for code 401
Here's the relevant parts of my ser config;
in route[1]
route[1]
{
...
if (method == "REGISTER")
{
route(2);
}
route(1);
}
route[2]
{
# Check to see if the UAC is trying to UNREGISTER. If not test
# for NAT. If NAT is present, we mark it as such before we save()
# the location, that way flag 6 is always set for NATed UAs.
if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19"))
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: NATed client, enabling
NAT\n");
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
# We must handle replies for registrations, for caching and location
# tracking purposes.
t_on_reply("1");
t_on_failure("1");
# Check for digest
#if (radius_www_authorize(""))
#{
# xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: No Digest, sending
challenge\n");
# www_challenge("", "0");
# exit;
#}
# Digest was good if we get here
#save("location");
# Relay register to porta
t_relay("216.151.143.69");
}
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
# save("location");
};
}
31 Oct
31 Oct
9:47 a.m.
Hello,
On 10/30/08 01:10, Daniel Corbe wrote:
Guys,
When attempting to pass REGISTER requests up stream I get the
following error messages on the console (below). This also brings up
the question of "what is the best way to simply pass REGISTER requests
on to an upstream registrar?"
Thanks for the help.
-Daniel
REGISTER: NATed client, enabling NAT
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:59 [48175] CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response:
pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for code 401
Here's the relevant parts of my ser config;
in route[1]
route[1]
{
...
if (method == "REGISTER")
{
route(2);
}
route(1);
}
route[2]
{
# Check to see if the UAC is trying to UNREGISTER. If not test
# for NAT. If NAT is present, we mark it as such before we save()
# the location, that way flag 6 is always set for NATed UAs.
if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19"))
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: NATed client, enabling
NAT\n");
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
# We must handle replies for registrations, for caching and
location
# tracking purposes.
t_on_reply("1");
t_on_failure("1");
# Check for digest
#if (radius_www_authorize(""))
#{
# xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: No Digest, sending
challenge\n");
# www_challenge("", "0");
# exit;
#}
# Digest was good if we get here
#save("location");
# Relay register to porta
t_relay("216.151.143.69 <http://216.151.143.69>");
}
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
# save("location");
};
}
you need a line with:
exit;
at the end of route[2]. Also, there seem to be looping in route[1] if
you handle non-REGISTER.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
2 Nov
2 Nov
9:27 a.m.
Is there a way to save the contact binding on the reply? save("location")
throws an error that says it cannot be used in reply blocks.
Thanks.
-Daniel
Nov 2 02:21:27 [61791] CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse error in config file,
line 417, column 10-11: Command cannot be used in the block
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
save("location");
};
}
If I can't use the save("location") in the onreply block, then how do I
cache the contact binding?
Is there a way to do it from within a module? I might consider coding
something up if that is the case. What module does the save command live
in?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On 10/30/08 01:10, Daniel Corbe wrote:
Guys,
When attempting to pass REGISTER requests up stream I get the following
error messages on the console (below). This also brings up the question of
"what is the best way to simply pass REGISTER requests on to an upstream
registrar?"
Thanks for the help.
-Daniel
REGISTER: NATed client, enabling NAT
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:59 [48175] CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response: pick_branch
failed (lowest==-1) for code 401
Here's the relevant parts of my ser config;
in route[1]
route[1]
{
...
if (method == "REGISTER")
{
route(2);
}
route(1);
}
route[2]
{
# Check to see if the UAC is trying to UNREGISTER. If not test
# for NAT. If NAT is present, we mark it as such before we save()
# the location, that way flag 6 is always set for NATed UAs.
if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19"))
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: NATed client, enabling
NAT\n");
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
# We must handle replies for registrations, for caching and
location
# tracking purposes.
t_on_reply("1");
t_on_failure("1");
# Check for digest
#if (radius_www_authorize(""))
#{
# xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: No Digest, sending
challenge\n");
# www_challenge("", "0");
# exit;
#}
# Digest was good if we get here
#save("location");
# Relay register to porta
t_relay("216.151.143.69 <http://216.151.143.69>");
}
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
# save("location");
};
}
you need a line with:
exit;
at the end of route[2]. Also, there seem to be looping in route[1] if you
handle non-REGISTER.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
8 Nov
8 Nov
12:41 a.m.
Daniel Corbe wrote:
Is there a way to save the contact binding on the
reply?
save("location") throws an error that says it cannot be used in reply
blocks.
Yes, this is a known problem. For such usage I think a dedicated module
(e.g. "relay_register) is needed.
regards
klaus
PS: if the registrar supports Path then you could use the Path feature.
Thanks.
-Daniel
Nov 2 02:21:27 [61791] CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse error in config
file, line 417, column 10-11: Command cannot be used in the block
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
save("location");
};
}
If I can't use the save("location") in the onreply block, then how do I
cache the contact binding?
Is there a way to do it from within a module? I might consider coding
something up if that is the case. What module does the save command
live in?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 10/30/08 01:10, Daniel Corbe wrote:
Guys,
When attempting to pass REGISTER requests up stream I get the
following error messages on the console (below). This also
brings up the question of "what is the best way to simply pass
REGISTER requests on to an upstream registrar?"
Thanks for the help.
-Daniel
REGISTER: NATed client, enabling NAT
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for
forwarding
Oct 29 18:03:58 [48175] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Oct 29 18:03:59 [48175] CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response:
pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for code 401
Here's the relevant parts of my ser config;
in route[1]
route[1]
{
...
if (method == "REGISTER")
{
route(2);
}
route(1);
}
route[2]
{
# Check to see if the UAC is trying to UNREGISTER. If
not test
# for NAT. If NAT is present, we mark it as such before
we save()
# the location, that way flag 6 is always set for NATed UAs.
if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") &&
nat_uac_test("19")) {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: NATed client,
enabling NAT\n");
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
# We must handle replies for registrations, for caching
and location
# tracking purposes.
t_on_reply("1");
t_on_failure("1");
# Check for digest
#if (radius_www_authorize(""))
#{
# xlog("L_NOTICE", "REGISTER: No Digest, sending
challenge\n");
# www_challenge("", "0");
# exit;
#}
# Digest was good if we get here
#save("location");
# Relay register to porta
t_relay("216.151.143.69 <http://216.151.143.69>
<http://216.151.143.69>");
}
onreply_route[2]
{
if (status =~ "2[0-9][0-9]")
{
# save("location");
};
}
you need a line with:
exit;
at the end of route[2]. Also, there seem to be looping in route[1]
if you handle non-REGISTER.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5643
days inactive
5652
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel Corbe -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Klaus Darilion