Hi Bogdan, Sorry for late response. Yes these 3 log showing up together. What about the 3th log? this is not an error too, isn't it? Could you apply the attached patch to fix the loglevel for these logs, please? Thanks, Tamas Bogdan-Andrei Iancu írta: Index: modules/tm/t_fwd.c =================================================================== --- modules/tm/t_fwd.c (revision 3521) +++ modules/tm/t_fwd.c (working copy) @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ /* do not forward requests which were already cancelled*/ if (was_cancelled(t)) { - LOG(L_ERR,"ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: discarding fwd for " + LOG(L_DBG,"DEBUG:tm:t_forward_nonack: discarding fwd for " "a cancelled transaction\n"); ser_error = E_NO_DESTINATION; return -1; Index: modules/tm/tm.c =================================================================== --- modules/tm/tm.c (revision 3521) +++ modules/tm/tm.c (working copy) @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ /* first get the transaction */ t = get_t(); if ( t==0 || t==T_UNDEFINED ) { - LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: t_check_status: cannot check status for a reply " + LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: t_check_status: cannot check status for a reply " "which has no T-state established\n"); return -1; } @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ ret = t_forward_nonack( t, p_msg, (struct proxy_l *)proxy); if (ret<=0 ) { - LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed\n"); + LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed\n"); return t_relay_inerr2scripterr(); } return ret;