---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: Greger V. Teigre
Cc: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?

> Thanks Greger.
>
> One more question - how would I use force_send_socket()?
>
> Do I replace t_relay() or is this just to be called at the top of the
> main route block or something?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
> On 4/29/05, Greger V. Teigre <greger@teigre.com> wrote:
> Supported in >=0.9.0:
>    force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
>        sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one
> of the
>        sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g.
> udp
>        message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the
> same
>        protocol is used.
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: Java Rockx
> To: serusers
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
> Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
> Interface?
>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
>> follows:
>>
>> eth0: 10.3.0.221
>> eth1: 10.2.0.42
>>
>> If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
>> any replies out eth1?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers@lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers