Hi Sergey,

Only testing with the SIP INVITE from one of our production SIP trunk providers. The 'length's are listed below for the tcpdump. Same packet size/contents for all tests. Only change was moving IP from interface em3 to em1. Doesn't look like packet size is the issue.

Looking at some of the socket code. Could be related to socket structs, maybe an array enumeration issue. We have 4 interfaces: em1 ((10g up), em2(10g down), em3 (1g up), em4 (1g up). Just switched IP from 3rd interface (2nd up) to 1st interface (1st up) - it worked.

If somebody would like to provide a debug message/location, I could recompile to test the array bucket theory. Quick way to check.

Note, the config below is the entire test config. No changes. Only purpose was to receive SIP INVITE to test socket.

Thanks,
Dan

Sergey Safarov wrote on 10/13/21 4:08 AM:
you also need to check UDP packets are fragmented or not.
you must receive all fragments before Kamailio is able to parse the message.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:28 AM David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> wrote:
use the

listen=udp:YOUR-LOCAL-IP:5060

then do a netstat to see if it's listening on 5060


Regards,

David Villasmil
phone: +34669448337


On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:17 PM <dem@htsweb.com> wrote:
Okay, think I discovered something....

I'm attempting to run the kamailio on interface em3 - no joy.  I moved the 10.102.88.81 ip to the em1 interface. kamailio is showing the UDP packets as received (via my horribly simple config below).

This test also answers the firewall question, UDP port is allowed.

So, that prompts the question... how do you use kamailio with UDP on a specific interface ?  I'm thinking it might not do it currently ?

Also, forgive me if I messed up the prior reply to the list.

Thanks,
Dan

dem@htsweb.com wrote on 10/12/21 5:28 PM:
Hello,

The tcpdump (below) shows packet reaching em3 interface. The firewalld command (below) shows UDP port 5060 open.

netcat doesn't do specific interfaces. Can't do ALL interfaces, since em4 is a pcap of hundreds of thousands of live UDP 5060.

I'll have to write a standalone to prove that the firewall allows UDP 5060 through the em3 interface, post firewall... (betting it does). Should have test prog tomorrow.

Thanks,
Dan

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote on 10/12/21 4:27 PM:

Hello,

tcpdump and other network sniffers (e.g., ngrep, sngrep) capture the sip traffic before firewall, so even if you see packets with them, the application can still not get them due to firewall.

To test, you can replace kamailio with netcat listening on UDP port 5060 and see if it receives the sip traffic.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12.10.21 19:08, dem@htsweb.com wrote:
After 4 (long) days of trying to receive any UDP SIP, I'm hoping someone can point out what I'm doing wrong. I've looked at the kamailio code. I'm beginning to think it's the 'polling' code, but it looks fine. It could be Centos or a Dell network driver, but not seeing any errors anywhere.

- stock build/compile...
  Version: kamailio 5.5.2 (x86_64/linux) 0d53d9
  Compile flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
  MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE=262144
  MAX_URI_SIZE=1024
  BUF_SIZE=65535
  DEFAULT PKG_SIZE=8MB
  DEFAULT SHM_SIZE=64MB
  ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
  TCP poll methods: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select
  Source code revision ID: 0d53d9
  Compiled with: gcc 4.8.5
  Compiled architecture: x86_64
  Compiled on: 08:44:19 Oct 11 2021

Running Centos 7 all updated. Dell R630.
# sestatus
SELinux status:                 disabled
# firewall-cmd --list-all
  ports: 5666/tcp 873/tcp 873/udp 80/tcp 443/tcp 5060/tcp 5060/udp 5061/tcp 5061/udp

- Just trying to send SIP INVITE from trunk provider to R630 kamailio...
(SIP trunk) UDP 172.200.200.202:5060 -> (firewall) UDP 172.250.250.162:5060 -> 1:1 NAT -> (R630) UDP 10.102.88.81:5060

- I can 'see' the packet hit the em3 network...
#  tcpdump -i em3 -e -vv -n port 5060
11:53:33.260892 99:99:ef:3e:69:c1 > 99:99:1c:48:4e:e3, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1366: (tos 0x0, ttl 54, id 20430, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 1352)
    172.200.200.202.sip > 10.102.88.81.sip: [udp sum ok] SIP, length: 1324
    INVITE sip:+18005551234@172.250.250.162:5060 SIP/2.0
    ...

At this point, I just need to see a SIP INVITE received. Then I can go back to working on a real config.

I've tried with TCP on/off, listening on all networks, alias on/off, strace and everything else I could think of. Truly appreciate any guidance.

Tried every sample config possible, but I just need to test receiving the SIP UDP packet, so this 'should' be minimum config...

#!KAMAILIO
debug=9
log_stderror=no
log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0
log_prefix="{$mt $hdr(CSeq) $ci} "
children=2
disable_tcp=yes
udp4_raw=on
auto_aliases=no
alias="sbc01.mysite.com"
listen=udp:10.102.88.81:5060

loadmodule "debugger.so"
loadmodule "jsonrpcs.so"
loadmodule "kex.so"
loadmodule "corex.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
loadmodule "rr.so"
loadmodule "pv.so"
loadmodule "textops.so"
loadmodule "siputils.so"
loadmodule "xlog.so"
loadmodule "sanity.so"
loadmodule "ctl.so"
loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so"

modparam("debugger", "cfgtrace", 1)

request_route {
  xlog("SIP received xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\n");
}

# kamcmd ps
11578    main process - attendant
11579    udp receiver child=0 sock=10.102.88.81:5060
11580    udp receiver child=1 sock=10.102.88.81:5060
11581    slow timer
11583    timer
11584    secondary timer
11585    JSONRPCS FIFO
11586    JSONRPCS DATAGRAM
11587    ctl handler

- I get plenty of logging, but the logging just waits here...
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:210]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected)
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:374]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 4800) called from core: core/io_wait.c: init_io_wait(469)
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10059]: DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 65456) returns address 0x7fd2a8c652d8 frag. 0x7fd2a8c652a0 (size=65456) on 1 -th hit
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 4800) returns address 0x7fd2a8c652d8 frag. 0x7fd2a8c652a0 (size=4800) on 1 -th hit
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:374]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 2400) called from core: core/io_wait.c: init_io_wait(516)
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 2400) returns address 0x7fd2a8c66600 frag. 0x7fd2a8c665c8 (size=2400) on 1 -th hit
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:246]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: adding socket 8, type 2, transport 3 (/var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl)
Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x7fd2a70a5360, 8, 2, 0x2439960), fd_no=0

- The only other thing that I see is transport 3. Isn't that a
UNIXS_SOCK?



__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
  * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
Nov 08-11, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - Nov 22-25, 2021 (America Timezone)
  * https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/


__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
  * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
  * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users