ok,
Thanks for answering ;)
 
I will reformulate
 
Using ser.cfg from onsip.org version 5.
 
When Uas register to ser, they are register with their privates IPs (192.168.xxx.xxx), not with the public Ip of the natted network.
Making a call requires proxy authentification but ser WWW-Challenge never arrives to UA(wrong adress).
Register works, even with authentification.
 
Any idea
 
In tha cfg, I have :
 
 
 if (method=="INVITE" && client_nat_test("7")) {
  # INSERT YOUR IP ADDRESS HERE
  record_route_preset("82.146.xxx.xxx:5060;nat=yes");
 } else if (method!="REGISTER") { 
  record_route(); 
 };
 and also :
 if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {
  setflag(6);
  fix_nated_register();
  force_rport();
 };
 
 if (!www_authorize("finalcut.be","subscriber")) {
  www_challenge("finalcut.be","0");
  break;
 };
 
 
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2005 14:10
À : Olivier Taylor; serusers@lists.iptel.org
Objet : Re: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip

Olivier,
You complained about no one answering your questions.  An advise: When writing a question, please state clearly what you want to accomplish, what the problem is, and as much information about the problem as possible.
I have rechecked some of your recent posts, they are all in telegraph language, and I find it very hard to understand what your question really is.
To be honest, the below question really makes no sense to me.
g-)
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Olivier Taylor
To: serusers@lists.iptel.org
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 01:44 PM
Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip

Using the last cfg from onsip.org, i just see that now Uas are registered with their private Ip when using mediaproxy.
Mediaproxy seems the best solution for scalability, that's why I want to test it.
 
Any Idea?


_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers