Now I understood why the messagem is forward with UDP
protocol... This problem occurs with bria on android plataform,
this softphone send the INVITE request with tls protocol specified
only on the contact header.
as Daniel pointed out, "The contact header address is not used for
routing SIP requests, only Route headers and R-URI addresses"
In this case, I should add the transport protocol TLS on R-URI
before to forward message with t_relay function... Correct?
it is not clear for me why you need to forward on TLS if the
destination address is not requiring that. Maybe you can draw a
diagram showing the call flow, who is on TLS and how is happening at
this moment and what you would like to happen.
I'm reading the source code of tm module to try
understand better this behavior...
I can't understand what meaning that "the outbound proxy
address is set"... where I define this address?
Outbound proxy address is stored in an internal structure,
it is not part of a SIP request. It represents the address
where to send the request, regardless of request URI (r-uri)
address. One common use case is when dealing with NAT
routers, the r-uri is set to the contact address of the
destination phone and the outbound proxy address is set to
the NAT router.
From configuration file, you can access it via $du (read and
write via assignment operation). There are couple of modules
that may set the outbound proxy address, like
registrar/usrloc, rr, lcr...
Maybe the best is to post here an ngrep with the SIP trace
of such case, that we can see if something is wrong.
Bruno,
the address from contact header is put into R-URI on
outgoing request to
that user. This is where I catch that parameter. I
think we should debug
why kamailio sends the request using UDP, it is not
clear, as Daniel
pointed out it should work automatically. I think I
had to do these
manipulations because in my case the outbound proxy
address is set
On 11/29/2011 05:38 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
> In my case the transport=TLS is present in
contact header, has the same
> treatment of R-URI?
>
> Cheers