Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your help with this.  Here is a trace:

http://pastebin.com/pXeFbwBz

I see the nat=yes parameter added to the Route header.  

I've posted the script here:

http://pastebin.com/2qwHYHvj

Forgive my ignorance, I can't tell what I'm doing wrong.

Thanks!

Spencer

On Aug 30, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Hello,

if your config it is based on the default one, the Route header for within dialog requests is marked by a parameter, nat=yes, that is used to decide whether to do rtpproxy or not.

So, if you have a custom config, check the default one for the nat traversal handling part.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 8/30/12 12:39 AM, Spencer Thomason wrote:

Hello,
I'm using Kamailio 3.2.4 for NAT traversal using rtpproxy_manage() in a largely stock script.  Everything works great until the far end (on a public ip) sends a t.38 re-INVITE.  The 200OK from the NATed UAC then doesn't trigger rtpproxy and the private IP in the sdp causes the fax to fail.  Any help handling these re-INVITEs would be greatly appreciated.  I'm happy to post traces if that helps describe the situation.  The network topology looks like this:

NATed UAC -> Kamailio on a public IP -> UAS on a public IP 


Thanks in advance,
Spencer


Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat