Dear Inaki,

Thanks for the help..really appreciated...I guess I should add a ACK check to loose route because as you said it's a new in dialog transaction...Please chek below:

if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
                                if ( t_check_trans() ) {
                                       
                                        t_relay();
                                        exit;
}
}

Regarding INFO and NOTIFY...I'll do that later after ACK is OK

What I did above is OK?

Regards

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
El Domingo, 15 de Marzo de 2009, michel freiha escribió:
> Here I defined the loose route to reply on the REINVITE message:
>
> if(loose_route()){
>   t_on_reply("7");
>   if (is_method("INVITE")) {
>     t_on_failure("1");
>     force_rtp_proxy();
>     t_relay();
>     exit();
>   }
> }

This is wrong. I already suggested you to compare your loose_route section
with that in the Kamailio default config file, but it seems you haven't done
it.

I hope you know that ACK after INVITE-200 is a *new* transaction, and an
in-dialog request (so it goes into loose_route section).
Question: is your loose_route section allowing this ACK to be routed? I just
see the t_relay for INVITE, what about other requests as INFO, PRACK,
NOTIFY... *ACK* ?






--
Iñaki Baz Castillo

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users