Hello,
can you give a try with latest master branch or by using the patch from next link?
- https://github.com/kamailio/
kamailio/commit/ 52111974b4571e0562e8e731df80f4 8dbc504915 Apparently the t_realy() stopped script execution (by returning 0) when e2e ACK forwarding was successful. The patch should change that to return true.
If all works fine while testing, then I will backport.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 22.12.17 14:05, Jean Cérien wrote:
Hello
I've tried mhomed = 1 with no luck - not so sure what you mean by default route, I've added listen = udp:myadsress:5060
I also have auto_aliases=no and alias=myaddress
However, what bugs me is that execution seems to stop INSIDE t_relay and the info message after the t_relay is not displayed.
I hate to say this, but could this be a bug ?
RgdsJ.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov@gmail.com> wrote:
Check that your installation have one NIC with only one default route on host.If not check that "mhomed=1" is enabled.
Sergey
пт, 22 дек. 2017 г. в 0:02, Jean Cérien <cerien.jean@gmail.com>:
______________________________
HelloI am using kamailio 5.0.2, on a debian 9 system.
Everything was running fine, until one of our voip provider changed his switch. Our kamailio is relaying between several voip providers and several asterisk (only the signalisation, no rtp).
When we get an invite from this new switch, we select an asterisk and relay it correctly to this box. However, the OK is relayed back. But when the voip providers sends an ACK for this OK, the t_relay function does not return at all, it just dies with no action and no error.
Here is the snippet from route(relay)
xlog("L_INFO","route(relay) @@ $rm - Source: $si:$sp, fu:$fu, tu:$tu\n" );$var(restrelay)=t_relay();xlog("L_INFO","route(relay) @@ $rm - t_relay result: $var(restrelay)" );if (!$var(restrelay)) {
When processing the initial invite, I do get both INFO messages. When the ACK is processed, I only get one INFO message, and no ACK is relayed - so it seems execution dies in the t_relay
What could be wrong ???
J.
Details of the ACK:
ACK sip:dialednumber@kamailioIP:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP VOIPPROVIDERIP:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjq16fi00d85uee181ic0.1 To: <sip:kamailioIP:5060>;tag=as7f10ed48 From: <sip:sourcenumber@orange-multimedia.fr >;tag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000 Call-ID: SD8u3ob01-688d41f5e2164ceeafe76f40b82b3f97-v300g00030 CSeq: 1 ACKMax-Forwards: 66Content-Length: 0Route: <sip:kamailioIP;lr=on;ftag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000 -0000;did=a0b.49d>
(should you have enough width; the diagram will look ok)
VOIP PROVIDER KAMAILIO ASTERISK21:38:54.685149 │ ──────────────────────────> │ │▒ +0.000451 │ 100 trying -- your call is │ │▒ 21:38:54.685600 │ <────────────────────────── │ │▒ +0.000084 │ │ INVITE (SDP) │▒ 21:38:54.685684 │ │ ──────────────────────────> │▒ +0.000831 │ │ 100 Trying │▒ 21:38:54.686515 │ │ <────────────────────────── │▒ +0.000471 │ │ 200 OK (SDP) │▒ 21:38:54.686986 │ │ <────────────────────────── │▒ +0.000394 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │▒ 21:38:54.687380 │ <────────────────────────── │ │▒ +0.038694 │ ACK │ │▒ 21:38:54.726074 │ ──────────────────────────> │ │▒ +0.060155 │ │ 200 OK (SDP) │▒ 21:38:54.786229 │ │ <<<──────────────────────── │▒ +0.000138 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │▒ 21:38:54.786367 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │▒ +0.005721 │ ACK │ │
_________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr- users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com