On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:44 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: 
jiri,

that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance 
for the port you are mentioning.

I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and OpenSER is 
following different direction of development, which makes  quite 
unrealistic  your sayings.

HA ! I understand better now, I almost got confused :-)