Hi,

    I am facing some challenge with dispatcher configuration with two Asterisk 

    I have installed Kamailio and  two Asterisk server  and Phones are register with Asterisk through Kamailio 
    I have followed this link http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-April/068175.html

    Now  i have added dispatcher module and dispatcher list also 

    I am try to route all calls to Asterisk with load balance

  Can please advice the step by step configuration to route calls  from Kamailio   to two Asterisk ( one call first Asterisk and Second call to other asterisk )

With Regards

N.Prakash 



On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Prakash N <prakash.n@tevatel.com> wrote:

Hi Muhammad,

We are following below document for Kamailio and Asterisk integration

http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb 


We are plan use one Kamailio with Multiple asterisk  (Queue,IVR and Conference purpose) 


Now calls are landing to asterisk with load balancing using  dispatcher for Queue and IVR (One asterisk first and next Asterisk for second calls )

But if try to calls extension it is landing both Asterisk server instead landing one asterisk first and next Asterisk for second calls 

Please advice

With Regards

N.Prakash



On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Muhammad Shahzad <shaheryarkh@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not sure what you are trying to do. Your description is too brief to understand. Can you send me complete call flow?

Thank you.


On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Prakash N <prakash.n@tevatel.com> wrote:

   Hi Muhammad,

    Thanks for your mail

   Actually we are trying to do load balance with one Kamailio with multiple Asterisk  server

   Now if call Queue,IVR to Kamailio it routing to asterisk with ramdam strategy load balance  ( first call on one and second to other server )
  If i call extension to extension it is landing to all Asterisk ( I have use all Asterisk feature for that i want to route all call to asterisk ) on the same time ,How to do load balance  for extension calling also

We are not sure what we are tiring  doi is right or wrong

Please advice and correct us if anything wrong

With Regards

N.Prakash

 

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Muhammad Shahzad <shaheryarkh@gmail.com> wrote:
Why are you forwarding instead of relaying the message to selected destination? Forward is stateless and therefore likely to have NAT issues, specially if destination server is behind NAT or client is behind NAT and destination server is unable to handle NAT etc. etc.

Also typically dispatcher is used to load balance calls between two or more upstream server, not for load balancing extensions within one server, though with some tweaking that might also be achieved but better to do this kind of thing on destination server rather then on kamailio.

Thank you.


On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Prakash N <prakash.n@tevatel.com> wrote:
Hi,

  Can you please advice for the below issue

With Regards

N.Prakash




On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Prakash N <prakash.n@tevatel.com> wrote:
Hi All,

We have finished the Kamailio & Asterisk real time integration and load balancing also done using dispatcher module.

Queue and voice mails are load balancing as well.When we are calling extension to extension it is showing in all the servers.It seems extension are not load balancing as per our knowledge.

I have attached the kamailio.cfg for your reference,Find my coding below as mentioned.

# -- dispatcher params for DB support --
modparam("dispatcher","db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@192.168.1.170/openser")
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "flags_col", "flags")
modparam("dispatcher", "priority_col", "priority")

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Dispatch requests
route[DISPATCH] {
if ( method=="INVITE" ) {
# dst_select( "GROUP", "HASH METHOD")
  ds_select_dst("1","4");
  sl_send_reply("100","Trying");
  forward();#uri:host, uri:port);
  exit();
}}

Kindly suggest the solution for the same.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

N.Prakash




--
Muhammad Shahzad
-----------------------------------
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell: +49 176 99 83 10 85
MSN: shari_786pk@hotmail.com
Email: shaheryarkh@googlemail.com




--
Muhammad Shahzad
-----------------------------------
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell: +49 176 99 83 10 85
MSN: shari_786pk@hotmail.com
Email: shaheryarkh@googlemail.com