Hi, please find below what you requested.

 

@Daniel: yes, I did ts_store() after relaying for both hops, but for the second call which should call account2, $ru is overwritten to account1 after t_continue

 

@Federico: as you requested, here is my route[LOCATION] and please the attached Kamailio log.

# USER location service

route[LOCATION]

 

#!ifdef WITH_SPEEDDIAL

        # search for short dialing - 2-digit extension

        if($rU=~"^[0-9][0-9]$")

                if(sd_lookup("speed_dial"))

                        route(SIPOUT);

#!endif

 

#!ifdef WITH_ALIASDB

        # search in DB-based aliases

        if(alias_db_lookup("dbaliases"))

                route(SIPOUT);

#!endif

 

#!ifdef WITH_FORK

        if($rU == "9999")

                route(FORK);

 

#!endif

 

#!ifdef WITH_PDT

        xdbg("before pdt $rU\n");

        #prefix2domain("0", "1");

        xdbg("after pdt $rU\n");

#!endif

        #Check if domains match

 

        if($fd != $rd)

                xdbg("From domain $fd does not match request uri domain $rd\n");

                send_reply("488", "Not Accetable Here");

                exit;

 

 

        #$rd = $td

        $avp(oexten) = $rU;

        if (!lookup("location"))

                $var(rc) = $rc;

                t_newtran();

                switch ($var(rc))

                        case -1:

                        case -3:

                                xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: User not found\n");

                                if (isflagset(FLT_ASTERISK_TRY))

                                        # Try calling with PUSH KIT

                                        send_reply("404", "Not Found");

                                 else

                                        # User not found, check if is an app based on uri prefix, then call it with pushkit

                                        if($(rUs.substr,0,6)=="007001")

                                                xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: Trying calling $ru with PUSUH KIT\n");

                                                # device token check missing

                                                route(SUSPEND);

                                                route(SENDPUSH);

                                         else

                                                setflag(FLT_ASTERISK_TRY);

                                                route(ASTERISK);

 

 

exit;

                        case -2:

                                send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed");

                                exit;

 

 

 

        # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also

        if (is_method("INVITE"))

                setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);

 

        route(RELAY);

        route(STORETRAN);

        exit;

 

 

route[STORETRAN]

        ts_store();

        $sht(vtp=>stored::$rU) = 1;

        xlog("L_ALERT", "stored transaction [$T(id_index):$T(id_label)] $fU => $rU\n");

 

 

 

Thanks to both,

Regards,

T.

 

Da: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] Per conto di Federico Cabiddu
Inviato: domenica 22 gennaio 2017 16:24
A: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Oggetto: Re: [SR-Users] serial forking calls using TSILO

 

Hi,

could you please provide the LOCATION route and the Kamailio's log at level 3?

Thank you.

 

Regards,

 

Federico

 

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Tomas Zanet <tzanet@came.com> wrote:

Hello,

I’m using Kamailio 4.4.4 with TSILO module in order to support Push Notifications used by our voip app on Apple ios10.

So far, everything works fine:  Kamailio can get an incoming call, suspend it, then send push notification with an external script, receive a new app registration and then call it after resuming the invite.

To do so, thanks to Mr, Cabiddu, I used all the functions described here

http://www.kamailio.org/events/2015-KamailioWorld/Day2/20-Federico.Cabiddu-Kamailio-In-A-Mobile-World.pdf

 

 

Right now, I would like to support serial forking calls using push notification because it was already supported with legacy voip.

To do so, I used failure_route function where, after getting the call destinations and setting them into an avp, I set the new SIP request uri $ru.

Here is my failure_route:

failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]

        route(NATMANAGE);

        if (t_is_canceled())

                exit;

 

 

#!ifdef WITH_BLOCK3XX

        # block call redirect based on 3xx replies.

        if (t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]"))

                t_reply("404","Not found");

                exit;

 

#!endif

 

       if (is_avp_set("$avp(group_members_db)"))

                $ru ="sip:"+$avp(group_members_db)+"@"+$fd;

                $avp(group_members_db) = $null;

                route(LOCATION);

                exit;

 

 

 

I am troubleshooting this scenario and this is what I see:

1) Kamailio receives incoming call

2) Suspend it

3) Send Push notification to account1

4) Kamailio receives account1 registration -> INVRESUME route is now called

5) Then call account1

6) Nobody answers the call

7) failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] is now called -> set $ru with next sipaccount: account2

8) suspend invite

9) send push notification to account2

10) account2 sends its sip registration -> INVRESUME route is now called

11) Kamailio calls account1 instead of account2 -> this is my issue

 

On step 10: despite account2 is registered, I checked it using “kamctl ul show”, the second call is forwarded all'account1 and not to account2.

I also checked the TSILO logs and everything seems ok. Here is the logs:

First call:

      suspended transaction [53945:1648394094] asterisk => account1

      htable key value [53945:1648394094]

      resuming trasaction [53945:1648394094] account1 53945:1648394094)

second call:

      suspended transaction [53945:1648394094] asterisk => account2

      htable key value [53945:1648394094]

      resuming trasaction [53945:1648394094] account2 53945:1648394094)

 

In order to find out the issue I put some xlogs, printing $ru value: what I see is the $ru value is set correctly on failure_route but as soon as the t_continue is called, the ru overwritten back to account1

 

Can anyone address me to find out the solution?

Thanks in advance

 

T.

 

 

Tomas Zanet
Software Design Department
tzanet@came.com

 

 

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

 

 

Tomas Zanet
Software Design Department
tzanet@came.com

 

 

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users