I think serial because the new branch is only created in case the first is timeout.
De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 7 juillet 2017 12:40
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; Nicolas Breuer <Nicolas.Breuer@belcenter.biz>
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode
Hello,
are you doing parallel forking or serial forking?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07.07.17 12:24, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
Hello,
Some help here is needed
# auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg
modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3)
I test a call with two branches.
1st branch received a 408 timeout error
2nd branch received a 486 busy.
Normally the failure route should be with the 486.
NOTICE: <script>: Failure route -----2---1--408----
We can see the 408 is the winning reply but I understood from the documentation that if
Failure reply mode is “3” , the winning reply is always the reply from the last branch J
It’s a problem because if the 1st is timeout (because down), the second is OK but callee is busy ; we don’t send the right reply to the caller
_______________________________________________Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com