Hello,

just to clarify -- did you tried and there were some issues, or just pure validation of the regex in the subst?

If the second, I would rather use subdt_hf(), but not sure it's in 4.3 or added later. Then instead of \2, I would use $tU (To header username).

Likely you can also completely avoid substitution operations, by doing:

remove_hf("To");

insert_hf("To: <sip:$tU@$rd:rp>;tag=$tt\r\n");

I need a sanity check if you don’t mind…  I am setting up a stateless proxy for several (separate, not load balanced) Asterisk servers behind Kamailio 4.2 (with domain and dispatcher).  All works as expected except when called party hangs up, as Asterisk seems to address the BYE “To” (that is sent to the calling party) to the originating domain, and not the IP of the UA (as it does in other cases).  When this happens, stateless Kamailio does not seem to know how to route them, which makes sense.  I assume I would need to rewrite the “To” field on BYE message so that it contains the UA’s IP (to match the BYE’s that are routed correctly).  The RURI header contains the IP/port of the UA, so I am attempting to use it and here is where I am stuck…

Here is the subst from onreply_route:

   if (is_method("BYE")) {

xlog("L_NOTICE", "BYE Detected \n");

subst('/^To:(.*)<sip:(.*)@(.*)>(.*)$/To: <sip:\2@$rd:$rp>\4/ig');

}

Here is the “To”:

    To: "Test User 2" <sip:102@zxcv.asdf.qwerty.net>;tag=8AB53900B9646F1DF05330E7FBF846C8  

Any obvious glaring mistakes here?  Would I then need additional logic to forward the BYE on?

My apologies if this is wordy, or nonsensical...

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com