On 13 July 2010 14:07, Henning Westerholt
<henning.westerholt@1und1.de> wrote:
On Tuesday 13 July 2010, Maw Zin Tun - Real Telekom wrote:
> Actually it doesn't matter for me if it's active-passive as well. Just need
> to make sure no disaster since my whole SBC is depending on kamailio
> redirect server for passing traffic. Outbound route selection is mainly
> done by mySQL queries and my SBC, Genband S3 has ability to distribute
> invite to redirect servers. Do you think having two kamailio servers lined
> to culstered mySQL server is simplest and most reliable solution? Or any
> other better approach?
> Thanks,
Hi Maw,
we're using a pool of identical kamailio load balancers in front of our
systems, requests are distributed to it by routing means or DNS. If one of
this system fails or needs to be removed out of the pool (e.g. for
maintenance) we just move its IP adress to one of the other active or spare
machines. For more planned maintenance you can of course also use DNS to shift
load from one machine to another.
Cheers,
Henning
Hi List,
Sorry to butt in on this conversation. What is the recommended way to achieve failover and redundancy?
I know of some solutions running Heartbeat and DRBD and also some people use SRV records and DRBD or MYSQL replication.
What is the recommended way of achieving high availability SR scenarios.
Cheers.
Brian