Thanx Daniel, Will send mails at alternative address in future if required,
79.3 is actually transparent web proxy. I m using X-Lite (www.xten.com)
Originally 202.133.64.71 is ser,
202.133.64.66 is caller
202.133.64.67 is callee
 
 
I hv sent u another mail which includes ngrep o/p from ser
 
Regards,
JF
 


Daniel-Constantin Mierla <Daniel-Constantin.Mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Hello,
I got the debug messages -- if the mail is too large, send it to
serteam@iptel.org instead of serusers@lists.iptel.org -- this one has size
limitation.

The INVITE is processed correctly, the Request-URI is replaced with the
contact address of the destination user (2222) and then the request is
forwarded but the client does not react.

What kind of SIP client do you use? Both clients are registered from
same IP address and port (202.133.79.3:5060).

}Daniel

On 10/2/2003 11:50 AM, John Foster wrote:

> Previous mail stuck for moderator, due to larger size of mail..
>
>
> Hi All n Daniel,
>
> Here are network Dumps..
> Sorry for too lengthy dumps:) These include first portion of starting
> up ser -d -d -E, then both soft phone logged in, lastly there are
> traces of call initiating attempts from user 12345@cooking.com.pk
> to user 22222@cooking.com.pk
>
>
>
> Regards,
> JF
>



Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search