You don't need to do so in branch route. You can do this within request_route. 

On Thu, 4 May 2023, 12:55 Benoit Panizzon, <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch> wrote:
Hello

Is there a possibility to send a reply from within a branch route?

Experimental case (yes, I know it's a non working set-up, but I just
wonder if that would be possible).

Two registrar nodes, location information shared between the two.

CPE registers via TLS, therefore the existing connection shall be used
towards the CPE and that only exists on one of the registrars.

So in the Branch Route I would like to do something like:

$var(socket) = $(ulc(aor=>socket)[$T_branch_idx]);

if ($var(socket) == 0) {
        send_reply("503","no local socket");
}

This would cause the core routing instance to select the next registrar
from the dispatcher list which hopefully holds the active socket.

But none of the 'send_reply' variants seem to be allowed within a
branch route.

Or is there a better solution?

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e   A G    -    Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29             Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln                Fax  +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz                         Web  http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: