On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at> wrote:

IIRC force_send_socket operates on "branch[0]". Now it depends how the the new branch is added, e.g. if send--socket properties are copied into new branch or not. IRRC there were some changes either in 1.5 or 3.0.

You can also access a branch's aprameter directly:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/pseudo-variables/devel#branch_attributes

or try Juha's suggestion with branch_route

regards
klaus

Am 28.06.2010 19:08, schrieb Geoffrey Mina:

I am having an issue with 1.5.4 where force_send_socket() isn't behaving
as I would expect.

I have an LCR scenario where depending on which gateway I am sending to,
I send from a different socket.

It appears that calling force_send_socket from failure_route has no
affect on the routing. In my initial route block I call
force_send_socket(X.X.X.180:5060). In my failure_route I am calling
force_send_socket(X.X.X.179:5060), yet after calling the subsequent
time, my sip trace and tcpdump are clearly showing kamailio is still
sending from X.X.X.180:5060.

I have added a lot of debug lines, so I am 100% sure the second call to
force_send_socket is happening.

Am I misusing this module in some way?

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users