Hello,

iirc, if one node doesn't handle a SIP register itself, should not publish to other nodes anything. Is this what you are looking for -- one node not to send to the others?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 20/10/15 17:24, Sebastian Damm wrote:

Hi,

I evaluated the dmq_usrloc module, and it works pretty good if there are two identical machines which replicate their location with each other. But what I actually want to do is to send registrations to an extra machine which is just there for writing the location into a central DB (in one table for all the registrars), from where it can be accessed (by a web page for example).

So for example, I have three machines, registrar 1 and registrar 2, and receiver. receiver will never interact with customers. It is just there for writing the location into the database.

I configured both registrars to send their packets to receiver, and I configured the receiver to send its packets (which it actually never does) to a dns name containing both registrars. But after reading the content of some PING messages and reading something about "autodiscovery" of dmq on the mailing list, I'm not sure whether my scenario will work the way I want it to.

Can somebody explain whether I can use dmq_usrloc for this purpose? Or is it only intended to be used for bidirectional replication?

Best Regards,

Sebastian