Hello Daniel,
Thanks for your response, but I still think there's an error in openser. Let me explain it:
This is the first INVITE that arrives at openser (Frame #3)
Frame 3 (1257 bytes on wire, 1257 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: 00:00:00_00:00:00 (00:00:00:00:00:00), Dst: Dell_aa:32:dd (00:11:43:aa:32:dd)
Internet Protocol, Src: 10.161.14.59 (10.161.14.59), Dst: 10.161.14.110 (10.161.14.110
)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5060 (5060), Dst Port: 7000 (7000)
Session Initiation Protocol
Request-Line: INVITE sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev SIP/2.0
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bK2c42bc6a078c550314f3b9c31ddcf05d;XXXST_002,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bKdbe6e7de6d54b4e9ab0b8e1dc4a09cb3;XXXIT_002,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bKbee4d2140af14727cd281a783633a8f
From: <sip:user3@home2.jagarvayo.dev>;tag=6661
To: <sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev>
Supported: 100rel
Call-ID: 1-17070@10.161.14.105
CSeq: 1 INVITE
This is the INVITE proxied by openser (Frame #5)
Frame 5 (1397 bytes on wire, 1397 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: Dell_bb:14:43 (00:11:43:bb:14:43), Dst: 00:00:00_00:00:01 (00:00:00:00:00:01)
Internet Protocol, Src: 10.161.14.110 (10.161.14.110), Dst: 10.161.14.59 (10.161.14.59
)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 7000 (7000), Dst Port: 5060 (5060)
Session Initiation Protocol
Request-Line: INVITE sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev SIP/2.0
Message Header
Record-Route: <sip:10.161.14.110:7000;ftag=6661;lr>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.110:7000;branch=z9hG4bK5ead.85b42d6fbdf28af51be1fd77461ef605.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bK2c42bc6a078c550314f3b9c31ddcf05d;XXXST_002,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bKdbe6e7de6d54b4e9ab0b8e1dc4a09cb3;XXXIT_002,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bKbee4d2140af14727cd281a783633a8f
From: <sip:user3@home2.jagarvayo.dev>;tag=6661
To: <sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev>
Supported: 100rel
Call-ID: 1-17070@10.161.14.105
CSeq: 1 INVITE
This the CANCEL message that arrives at openser (Frame #19)
Frame 19 (349 bytes on wire, 349 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: 00:00:00_00:00:00 (00:00:00:00:00:00), Dst: Dell_aa:32:dd (00:11:43:aa:32:dd)
Internet Protocol, Src: 10.161.14.59 (10.161.14.59), Dst: 10.161.14.110 (10.161.14.110
)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5060 (5060), Dst Port: 7000 (7000)
Session Initiation Protocol
Request-Line: CANCEL sip:10.161.14.105:6030 SIP/2.0
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bK2c42bc6a078c550314f3b9c31ddcf05d;XXXST_002
Call-ID: 1-17070@10.161.14.105
From: <sip:user3@home2.jagarvayo.dev>;tag=6661
To: <sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev>
CSeq: 1 CANCEL
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Length: 0
This is the CANCEL message sent by openser (Frame #20), to cancel the invite in frame #5
Frame 20 (451 bytes on wire, 451 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: Dell_bb:14:43 (00:11:43:bb:14:43), Dst: 00:00:00_00:00:01 (00:00:00:00:00:01)
Internet Protocol, Src: 10.161.14.110 (10.161.14.110), Dst: 10.161.14.59 (10.161.14.59
)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 7000 (7000), Dst Port: 5060 (5060)
Session Initiation Protocol
Request-Line: CANCEL sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev SIP/2.0
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.110:7000;branch=z9hG4bK5ead.24bd76c541a061667969156e698855df.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.161.14.59;branch=z9hG4bK2c42bc6a078c550314f3b9c31ddcf05d;XXXST_002
Call-ID: 1-17070@10.161.14.105
From: <sip:user3@home2.jagarvayo.dev>;tag=6661
To: <sip:user4@home2.jagarvayo.dev>
CSeq: 1 CANCEL
Max-Forwards: 69
Content-Length: 0
Should not the CANCEL in frame #20 have the same branch as in the INVITE in frame #5? (As it is said in 3261)
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.110:7000;branch=z9hG4bK5ead.85b42d6fbdf28af51be1fd77461ef605.0
instead of
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.161.14.110:7000;branch=z9hG4bK5ead.24bd76c541a061667969156e698855df.0
The proxy in 10.161.14.59 is answering "call leg transaction does not exists" because there is no transaction with that branch.
I agree that the proxy at 10.161.14.59 has changed the request-uri, but
openser seems to locate the transaction to be cancelled but still does
not put a right branch in the CANCEL.
Best Regards,
Jose Antonio