This is what I testet:
route[ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR]
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR");
if(!t_is_failure_route())
{
record_route();
}
$var(count_dlg) = 0;
route(ROUTE_SET_CALLER_DIALOG);
$du = "sip:192.168.20.100:5060";
xlog("L_INFO", "Trigger CF loop NR to '$du' for call to '$ru' - [% logreq -%]\n");
t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE_HUNT");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_ROUTE_FWD_LOOP");
}
while(is_avp_set("$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0])"))
{
$ru = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]);
$var(new_ruri) = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]);
$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]) = $null;
xlog("L_NOTICE", "1 DST: $ru");
append_branch($avp(new_ruri));
route(ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR);
}
t_relay_to("0x01");
exit;
With $avp(s:cf_destinations)[0] = "555@dom1.com" and $avp(s:cf_destinations)[1] = "666@dom1.com", what I get on the logs is ...
[...]
1 DST: sip:555@dom1.com
1 DST: sip:666@dom1.com
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:666@dom1.com ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:666@dom1.com ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73
[...]
Meaning (from my ignorance), that the last $ru it's used for both 'appended_branches', no matter what I pass to append_branch
When I expected:
[...]
1 DST: sip:555@dom1.com
1 DST: sip:666@dom1.com
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:555@dom1.com ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73.1
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:666@dom1.com ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73.2
[...]
Are there any example of parallel forking, that works like this? ... I'm doing something terrible wrong?
Best regards