Yes, it looks like for some reason all of my messages got queued and flowed in late yesterday (looks like something to do with the use of reply all and having additional recipients?), so despite realizing the answer after sending, the messages hit hours later. πŸ™

Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer



E: bkaufman@bcmone.com




 

SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810  |  SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510  |  Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768

img
img
img
 


From: Alex Balashov via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:02 AM
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: help on how to get ACK
 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Ben,

From 17.1.1.3:

"The ACK request constructed by the client transaction MUST contain
  values for the Call-ID, From, and Request-URI that are equal to the   values of those header fields in the request passed to the transport   by the client transaction (call this the "original request").  The To   header field in the ACK MUST equal the To header field in the   response being acknowledged, and therefore will usually differ from   the To header field in the original request by the addition of the   tag parameter.  The ACK MUST contain a single Via header field, and   this MUST be equal to the top Via header field of the original   request.  The CSeq header field in the ACK MUST contain the same   value for the sequence number as was present in the original request,   but the method parameter MUST be equal to "ACK"."
I think you are mistaken here. The Contact in the 300 should not be used.

β€”
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.

On Dec 24, 2024, at 9:51β€―AM, Ben Kaufman via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:

ο»Ώ
This is the contact in your 300:

sip:service@10.20.0.3:5060?P-Asserted-Identity=%2216001%22%3Csip%3A16001%3Bverstat%3DTN-Validation-Passed%4010.20.0.2%3A5060%3E

This is the URI in your ACK:

sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060

It looks like you're using SIPp which is a pain this way.  Rather than coding the URI into the ACK of your SIPp scenario, add rss="true" to the recv line for your 300, and then use [next_url] in the template for your ACK mesasge.

Here is an example:  https://github.com/whosgonna/kamailio_http_async/blob/reply300/sipp/uac_expect_300.xml#L58 

Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer



E: bkaufman@bcmone.com




 

SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810  |  SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510  |  Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768

img
img
img
 


From: Sergio Charrua <sergio.charrua@voip.pt>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 4:14 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alexis Fidalgo <alzrck@gmail.com>; Ben Kaufman <bkaufman@bcmone.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Re: help on how to get ACK
 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hi !

I have the exact same issue as Alexis. This is my SIP flow (which I believe must be very similar, if not identical, to Alexis' ):

                                                          
            10.20.0.1:5060               10.20.20.1:5060  
        ──────────┬─────────          ──────────┬─────────
19:49:35.432327   β”‚        INVITE (SDP)         β”‚         
      +0.007536   β”‚ ──────────────────────────> β”‚         
19:49:35.439863   β”‚  100 trying -- your call is β”‚         
      +0.006997   β”‚ <────────────────────────── β”‚         
19:49:35.446860   β”‚  300 SL - Multiple Choices  β”‚         
      +0.001942   β”‚ <────────────────────────── β”‚         
19:49:35.448802   β”‚             ACK             β”‚         
                  β”‚ ──────────────────────────> β”‚         
                  β”‚                             β”‚         

INVITE sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.20.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3147164-1-0
From: sipp <sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060>;tag=1
To: <sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060>
Call-ID: 1-3147164@10.20.0.1
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060;transport=UDP>
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test
Content-Type: application/sdp
User-Agent: SIPp
Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uas
Supported: replaces, timer
Content-Length:   129

v=0
o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 10.20.0.1
s=-
c=IN IP4 10.20.0.1
t=0 0
m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000


SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.20.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3147164-1-0
From: sipp <sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060>;tag=1
To: <sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060>
Call-ID: 1-3147164@10.20.0.1
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Server: kamailio (5.8.2 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0


SIP/2.0 300 - Multiple Choices
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.20.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3147164-1-0
From: sipp <sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060>;tag=1
To: <sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060>;tag=d360f2f6fe5d9cd3912155e609771cc6-f406b8d3
Call-ID: 1-3147164@10.20.0.1
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:service@10.20.0.3:5060?P-Asserted-Identity=%2216001%22%3Csip%3A16001%3Bverstat%3DTN-Validation-Passed%4010.20.0.2%3A5060%3E>
Server: kamailio (5.8.2 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0

(The above 300 - Multiple Choice message has a new Contact header, that will be used by SBC to redirect the call somewhere else)

ACK sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.20.0.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3147164-1-3
Max-Forwards: 70
From: <sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060>;tag=1
To: <sip:1@10.20.20.1:5060>;tag=d360f2f6fe5d9cd3912155e609771cc6-f406b8d3
Contact: <sip:sipp@10.20.0.1:5060>
Call-ID: 1-3147164@10.20.0.1
CSeq: 1 ACK
User-Agent: SIPp
Content-Length: 0


From this point, Kamailio will re-send the 300 Multiple Choice message, repeating until timeout...



Atenciosamente / Kind Regards / Cordialement / Un saludo,


SΓ©rgio Charrua



On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 11:05β€―PM Ben Kaufman via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
Does your 3xx message have a Contact, and does that Contact URI match the RURI in your ACK?

Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer



E: bkaufman@bcmone.com




 

SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810  |  SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510  |  Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768

img
img
img
 


From: Alexis Fidalgo via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 3:19 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alexis Fidalgo <alzrck@gmail.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] help on how to get ACK
 
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hello all, moving just a bit aside of the http and async_http.

After all the real useful and interesting thread on that topic what helped me, im facing a problem i cant deal with and need a hint at least.

Scenario

INVITE -> Kamailio

on request_route
...
        if(is_method("INVITE")){
                t_newtran();
                http_async_query("http://nuc:8080", "HTTP_REPLY");
        }
…

Kamailio -> 100 - Trying


then

route[HTTP_REPLY] {
    if ($http_ok) {
        xlog("L_INFO", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: status $http_rs\n");
        xlog("L_INFO", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: body   $http_rb\n");
        t_reply(302,"Redirect");
    } else {
        xlog("L_INFO", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: error  $http_err)\n");
    }
}

Kamailio -> 302 Redirect
ACK -> Kamailio

This last ACK, how can i read it and use it to terminate the transaction? because Kamailio keeps transmitting the 302 message 3 more times until the transaction is finished by a timer

42(44) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1723]: t_retransmit_reply(): reply retransmitted. buf=0x7f4c44f9d680: SIP/2.0 3..., shmem=0x7f4c3fce7900: SIP/2.0 3
42(44) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1723]: t_retransmit_reply(): reply retransmitted. buf=0x7f4c44f9d680: SIP/2.0 3..., shmem=0x7f4c3fce7900: SIP/2.0 3
42(44) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1723]: t_retransmit_reply(): reply retransmitted. buf=0x7f4c44f9d680: SIP/2.0 3..., shmem=0x7f4c3fce7900: SIP/2.0 3
42(44) DEBUG: tm [timer.c:642]: wait_handler(): finished transaction: 0x7f4c3fcd35a0 (p:0x7f4c3fad85d0/n:0x7f4c3fad85d0)
42(44) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:133]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction 0x7f4c3fcd35a0 from timer.c:651


in request_route i have

        if(is_method("ACK")){
                if(!t_check_trans()){
                t_release();
                }
        exit;
        }


__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!