Sounds like a really cool idea. Also a great value add. TLS is also one of those that people tend to just skip until they get more advanced. Having a pre-configured second SER instance with TLS for a secured iptel.org interconnect would really take the hassle out of setting up your own server. iptel.org is its own CA, so maybe a way to request an iptel.org signed certificate for your server?! ;-)
g-)

samuel wrote:

Just thinking loud...may be not feasible... but....

it would be great that the base would enable easily interconnecting to other already running systems coming from the base via TLS so it would create kind of "trusted" SER nodes. This way newcomers to "SIP providers world" would have an added value installing the base...I think that just installing the right certificates in the base would make things easier.

This made me think about how many features would the base include?
*TLS
*auth_identity
*presence...

For all of them to work we need different instances of SER due to the ssl library incompatibility. How big are we gonna make the base?

Case we can deploy several TLS+auth_identiy running nodes it would be "easy" to add SPIT methods....

Maybe too far,
Samuel.

2008/2/28, Mike Trest - Personal <Mike@trest.com>:
At 11:11 AM 2/28/2008, SIP wrote:
>Tools:
>All tools (ser_ctl, sipsak, tcpdump/ngrep, wireshark/tshark, sipp,
>sip_scenario, spyagent+sipspy

I will install & maintain wireshark, tcpdump and any other standard
linux packages.
Anyone with specific version needs, just let me know.

I will need to lookup sipp, sip_scenario, spyagent,sipspy as I am not
familiar with them.
Anyone want to suggest a specifc version or URL for these?

..mike..

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
  