Hello Daniel,

Thanks for the reply. Indeed there is, not sure how I managed to miss that. And it wasn't about the schema after all:

Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:277]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - <core> [core/parser/parse_uri.c:1254]: parse_uri(): uri too short: <<BC><EA><8F>> (3)
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - <core> [core/parser/parse_uri.c:1328]: parse_sip_msg_uri(): bad uri <<BC><EA><8F>>
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: WARNING: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:282]: check_ruri_scheme(): failed to parse request uri [<BC><EA><8F>]
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 0
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: ERROR: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - <script>: Malformed SIP request from 172.30.154.189:5060

Still, not sure what the problem is though...

BR,

George

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

when the ruri scheme check fails, there should be another debug message saying that. Have you pasted all log messages for the failure case?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 07.07.20 22:23, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
Sorry, I realised I copy pasted wrong log messages for Call 1. Here's the relevant part showing success for call 1 in contrast with Call 2:

grep 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d kamailio.log | egrep 'check_ruri_scheme|w_sanity_check' | grep ACK
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:277]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:297]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme passed
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 1

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:34, George Diamantopoulos <georgediam@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello all,

I'm not 100% sure this is the only culprit in an issue I'm investigating, but superficially it appears that RURI scheme sanity module checks from the default config (flags 17895 in REQINIT) fail if the RURI in an ACK following a 487 includes parameters. Example from two calls from a kamailio instance acting as registrar/usrloc server, INVITE RURIs are after usrloc lookup:

Call 1: INVITE sip:voip-test-gd@172.17.173.14:5063 SIP/2.0

Call 2: INVITE sip:voip-test-user-02@10.2.24.142:32768;line=moo62e08 SIP/2.0

These INVITEs produce no complaints. Later, the same registrar produces ACKs to acknowledge 487 (thus, same transaction ACKs) responses from the next proxy in the path following a CANCEL:

Call 1: ACK sip:voip-test-gd@172.17.173.14:5063 SIP/2.0

Call 2: ACK sip:voip-test-user-02@10.2.24.142:32768;line=moo62e08 SIP/2.0

The next proxy (which produced/relayed the 487) processes the ACK for Call 1 successfully, but sanity_check at the proxy drops the request for Call 2 with:

DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:277]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 0

whereas Call 1 seems OK:

DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:305]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers entered
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d@voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:313]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers passed

Could this be a bug in sanity module? Is there anything one can do in config which could result in illegal ACKs being produced for hop-by-hop transactions? schema appears to be sip: in both cases...

Thank you. Best regards,

George
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla