Hello Pedro,

I set in main routing section and it I see 200 OK right now. Than you for help.

        # account only INVITEs
        if (is_method("INVITE"))
        {
                setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting
        }

        if (is_method("OPTIONS")) {
                sl_send_reply("200", "OK");
                exit;
        }

U 2014/03/30 22:32:47.139646 192.168.10.120:5062 -> 192.168.10.120:5060
OPTIONS sip:192.168.10.120 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.120:5062;branch=z9hG4bK6f8354a0.
Max-Forwards: 70.
From: "asterisk" <sip:1300@networklab.loc>;tag=as2cbae229.
To: <sip:192.168.10.120>.
Contact: <sip:1300@192.168.10.120:5062>.
Call-ID: 456f80c06d85d9b34027ccc533855f72@networklab.loc.
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS.
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 12.0.0.
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:32:47 GMT.
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH.
Supported: replaces, timer.
Content-Length: 0.
.

U 2014/03/30 22:32:47.140301 192.168.10.120:5060 -> 192.168.10.120:5062
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.120:5062;branch=z9hG4bK6f8354a0.
From: "asterisk" <sip:1300@networklab.loc>;tag=as2cbae229.
To: <sip:192.168.10.120>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.93f4.
Call-ID: 456f80c06d85d9b34027ccc533855f72@networklab.loc.
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS.
Server: kamailio (4.1.2 (x86_64/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.

Slava.

From: "Pedro Niño" <nino.pedro@gmail.com>
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:04:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484

Ok, I wonder....

If this is a message you're seeing at the asterisk server, it may be related to the qualify=yes or qualify=Number parameter in the peer, at sip.conf.

If it's right, then you can modify at 2 places: one, by disabling qualify. (qualify=no) at asterisk, or the other by configuring Kamailio to answer a 200 "OK" message when the message comes from the asterisk server.

If not, can you explain when are you seeing such behavior? And can run a 'sngrep host <asterisk_IP>' at the Kamailio server?

Keep me posted.

El mar 30, 2014 8:26 PM, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629@networklab.ca> escribió:

Hello Pedro,
So test case is simple. asterisk is play voicemail role and kamailio is gateway. Asterisk peer is setup and working. I think message SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete is some from kamailio

When Asterisk send reply back this message show up because is no $rU in header line.

I don't know how to correct it that it will full uri format line.

voice                     192.168.10.120                              Auto (No) No          A 5060     OK (2 ms)
3 sip peers [Monitored: 1 online, 0 offline Unmonitored: 2 online, 0 offline]

<--- SIP read from UDP:192.168.10.120:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.120:5062;branch=z9hG4bK4c787422
From: "asterisk" <sip:1300@networklab.loc>;tag=as5c659db3
To: <sip:192.168.10.120>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.b6d2
Call-ID: 4dc3968e64c3c16c4ad4f2407f2af4ee@networklab.loc
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
Contact: <sip:1300@192.168.10.120:5062>;expires=3600
Server: kamailio (4.1.2 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0

<------------->
--- (9 headers 0 lines) ---
Really destroying SIP dialog '4dc3968e64c3c16c4ad4f2407f2af4ee@networklab.loc' Method: OPTIONS

<--- SIP read from UDP:192.168.10.120:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.120:5062;branch=z9hG4bK4c787422
From: "asterisk" <sip:1300@networklab.loc>;tag=as5c659db3
To: <sip:192.168.10.120>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.b6d2
Call-ID: 4dc3968e64c3c16c4ad4f2407f2af4ee@networklab.loc
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
Contact: <sip:1300@192.168.10.120:5062>;expires=3600
Server: kamailio (4.1.2 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0

        if ($rU==$null)
        {
                # request with no Username in RURI
                sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete");
                exit;
        }

Slava.

From: "Pedro Niño" <nino.pedro@gmail.com>
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 8:30:56 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484

I think this is the correct behavior, as asterisk server is complaining about the address/request not containing all the necesary data to process the message
Can you please elaborate with a bit more of detail? Also can use tools like   sngrep, tcpdump (or wireshark) to have a better view of the complete call flow.
Maybe that way we can help.
El mar 29, 2014 1:59 AM, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629@networklab.ca> escribió:
Hello Everyone,
How to correct message 484
Is need use txt module to fill string with correct information ?

<--- SIP read from UDP:192.168.100.145:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.145:5062;branch=z9hG4bK5ec564e6
From: "asterisk" <sip:1300@networklab.loc>;tag=as0a530a8d
To: <sip:192.168.100.145>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.93df   ---> This line ins question.
Call-ID: 631e893f75da720865e8468132884367@networklab.loc
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
Contact: <sip:1300@192.168.100.145:5062>;expires=3600
Server: kamailio (4.1.2 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0

Slava.

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users