Hello!
Correct, we're using uac_replace_from() when passing along the initial INVITE. That INVITE looks good so it's not until this reINVITE that the header is scrambled.
Kind regards,
/Tobias
Hello,
kamailio is not adding user=phone to To header by itself, it has to be something in the kamailio.cfg. What do you use to change the To? Or for changing From in initial INVITE?
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your quick response. Makes totally sense, I'll need to debug why I'm getting that malformed header.
Do you think my second question is related? I cannot see the same malformed data in the example where the to-header is rewritten, it just looks like Kamailio adds ";user=phone" but the ip address is all obfuscated:
A similar issue seen, which for some reason doesn't create an ERROR, is when Kamailio receives a reINVITE looking like this which it's supposed to proxy:To: +123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.which is rewritten into:To: +123456789 <sip:123456789@127*0-)'.:/)&7'...0;user=phone>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.and sent out..
Thanks,/Tobias
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org> on behalf of Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:07 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?Hello,
the to header doesn't have the ending '>' after its uri:
<<+123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>>
The first << and last >> are from the log messages, but before ;tag=, it has to be another >, to close the one started before <sip:
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28/10/16 21:14, Tobias wrote:
Hi!
Having some issues with Kamailio 4.3 reporting a malformed header, but I cannot seem to figure out what's wrong.
The problem seen is:Oct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:678]: parse_addr_spec(): ERROR: parse_to : unexpected char [#015] in status 6: <<+123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>> .Oct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:165]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad to headerOct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: INFO: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header field [To: +123456789 <si]Oct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1050]: t_check_msg(): ERROR: reply cannot be parsedOct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:678]: parse_addr_spec(): ERROR: parse_to : unexpected char [#015] in status 6: <<+123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>> .Oct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:165]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad to headerOct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: INFO: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header field [To: +123456789 <si]Oct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1457]: adjust_clen(): error parsing content-lengthOct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:2214]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): error while adjusting Content-LengthOct 27 13:48:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:760]: do_forward_reply(): building failed
And the To header seen at this point is:To: +123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1>;tag=as24ed5606.
version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux)flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RESADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MBpoll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.id: unknowncompiled with gcc 4.7.2
I obviously understand Kamailio views this To header as malformed, but what I cannot understand is why? Is it as simple as the number +123456789 is not enclosed with ", i.e. it should be sent as "+123456789"?
A similar issue seen, which for some reason doesn't create an ERROR, is when Kamailio receives a reINVITE looking like this which it's supposed to proxy:To: +123456789 <sip:123456789@127.0.0.1>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
which is rewritten into:To: +123456789 <sip:123456789@127*0-)'.:/)&7'...0;user=phone>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
and sent out..
Thanks for your help,/Tobias
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com