I added the below xlog lines into my script:xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before loose_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before record_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");xlog("L_NOTICE", "After both: $si -> $ru - $du\n");Which generated the below output in syslog:Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before loose_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before record_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: After both: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>Seems that the destination URI is never set, the Route header is below:The use_received modparam for path is also set to 1.Any idea's/suggestions are greatly appreciated :)Kind regards,LukeOn 2 August 2016 at 09:40, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne@gmail.com> wrote:Morning Gents,Firstly, thanks for taking the time to reply :)Kamailio is doing the NAT detection and simply acting as a passthrough to FreeSWITCH (which handles all SIP registrations etc).Will setup the log lines shortly and share the results.kamailio -V outputs;version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 83e842flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RESADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MBpoll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.id: 83e842compiled on 18:22:39 Jan 26 2016 with gcc 4.9.2Kind regards,Luke - Chicane SupportOn 2 August 2016 at 07:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send the result to this mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received parameter?Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918 address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
--
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
----