Hi,

Anyone who had used t_suspend() and t_continue() can share the performance details?

I tried async module with one sec sleep time. I tried only 5 calls per second but still it was not successful. After sometime I see below logs,

Jan 21 13:51:55 PLT-RA-RD-W167A PCscf[16520]: ERROR: tm [t_suspend.c:128]: t_continue(): ERROR: t_continue: transaction not found

Jan 21 13:52:49 PLT-RA-RD-W167A last message repeated 15 times

Jan 21 13:59:38 PLT-RA-RD-W167A last message repeated 12 times

Jan 21 14:13:03 PLT-RA-RD-W167A last message repeated 5 times

Any configuration changes can help here?

Regards,

Shankar

From: Shankar [mailto:shankar.rk@plintron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:26 PM
To: 'Jason Penton'
Cc: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [SR-Users] FW: Regd. t_suspend() and t_continue()

Hi Jason,

I am using 4.0.2

Regards,

Shankar

From: Jason Penton [mailto:jason.penton@smilecoms.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:21 PM
To: Shankar
Cc: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] FW: Regd. t_suspend() and t_continue()

Hi Shankar,

What version of Kamailio are you running? Kamailio -V

Cheers

Jason

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Shankar <shankar.rk@plintron.com> wrote:

Hi Jason,

Please find below my response inline,

I have some questions for you as we have used suspend/continue quite a lot in the IMS code and don't have any leaks.

Firstly, why are you using pkg_mem for your hash_id and label? Remember that you will be in 2 different processes in the suspend and continue portions of the code... so pkg_mem will not work - you should use shm_mem instead.

[Shankar] We use pkg_mem because we are invoking t_continue from the same process ( using thread ).

Secondly, how are you using top to tell that you have a leak? Kamailio's memory is internally managed.

[Shankar] After running for say 20minutes, we get out of shared memory error. Also in top output we observed incremental increase in the shared usage of shared memory for the process.

Cheers

Jason

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Shankar <shankar.rk@plintron.com> wrote:

> Re-sending without the attachment.

> 

> 

> 

> *From:* Shankar [mailto:shankar.rk@plintron.com]

> *Sent:* Monday, January 13, 2014 4:57 PM

> *To:* 'sr-users@lists.sip-router.org'

> *Subject:* Regd. t_suspend() and t_continue()

> 

> 

> 

> Hi,

> 

> 

> 

> We are trying out the t_suspend() and t_continue() in our test setup.

> We are facing memory leak ( both shm and pkg as per top command results).

> 

> 

> 

> Please find below the scenario,

> 

> 

> 

> 1)      Do a t_newtran()

> 

> 2)      Allocate pkg memory for hashid and label.

> 

> 3)      Call t_suspend()

> 

> 4)      Do t_continue() when async result is available

> 

> 5)      De-allocate pkg memory reserved for hashid and label

> 

> 6)      Do a t_relay() which forwards the sip message to another sip node.

> 

> 

> 

> In the  step (6) above, we see t_newtran() allocates one more time

> shared memory for the same transaction.

> 

> 

> 

> We tried t_release() after step (4) to release the transaction as

> t_relay() anyways allocates new shared memory. Nothing helped.

> 

> 

> 

> Please let me know what are the logs you would require to debug the same.

> I am attaching syslog for this run.

> 

> 

> 

> Regards,

> 

> Shankar

--

Jason Penton

Senior Manager: Applications and Services

Smile Communications Pty (Ltd)

Mobile:	+27 (0) 83 283 7000
Skype:	jason.barry.penton

jason.penton@smilecoms.com

www.smilecoms.com

This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer