Hi Greger, On Tuesday 31 October 2006 11:20, Greger V. Teigre wrote:Thanks, Klaus :-) Here's a snippet that many may be interested in: When asked about STUN support, the client implementations replied: 6% I implement all the client requirements of draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis 6% I implement some, but not all, of the client requirements of draft-ietf-behave-rfc3498bis 13% I implement all of the client requirements of RFC3489 7% I implement some, but not all, of the client requirements of RFC3489 59% I do not implement STUN as a client 9% Otherplease consider that it makes not too much sense for gateways, proxys etc. to implement a STUN client. As a little bit more then 50% (I dont recall the exact number) were only UAs, I guess the majority of the 59% are the non-UAs. As usual their are several ways to read statistics ;-) NilsThere are still a large number of endpoints (25%) that do not use symmetric RTP. Klaus Darilion wrote:Hi! I found this link on the sip mailing list. http://www.sipit.net/report19.txt regards klaus_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers