Hi

How can I move force_send_socket() call into branch_route? Could someone give me an example, please.

Thank you

Ernest

I have this script:

########################################################################
# Failure route 'pstn-failover'
########################################################################
failure_route[1]
{

    xlog("L_INFO", "Failure route for PSTN entered - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
    route(16);

    if(!next_gw())
    {

        xlog("L_ERR", "Failed to select next PSTN gateway - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
        route(5);
        exit;
    }
    t_on_failure("1");

            switch($rd)
                {
                    case "10.10.10.2":
                            force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.1:5060);
                    case "10.10.10.4":
                            force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.3:5060);
                    case "10.10.10.6":
                            force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.5:5060);
                    case "10.10.10.8":
                            force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.7:5060);
                    break;
                }

    route(7);
}

On 29. 06. 2010 13:44, Geoffrey Mina wrote:

Yeah, Juha's suggestion worked perfectly. As soon as I moved the force_send_socket() call into branch_route everything started working.

Thanks.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at> wrote:

IIRC force_send_socket operates on "branch[0]". Now it depends how the the new branch is added, e.g. if send--socket properties are copied into new branch or not. IRRC there were some changes either in 1.5 or 3.0.

You can also access a branch's aprameter directly:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/pseudo-variables/devel#branch_attributes

or try Juha's suggestion with branch_route

regards
klaus

Am 28.06.2010 19:08, schrieb Geoffrey Mina:

I am having an issue with 1.5.4 where force_send_socket() isn't behaving
as I would expect.

I have an LCR scenario where depending on which gateway I am sending to,
I send from a different socket.

It appears that calling force_send_socket from failure_route has no
affect on the routing. In my initial route block I call
force_send_socket(X.X.X.180:5060). In my failure_route I am calling
force_send_socket(X.X.X.179:5060), yet after calling the subsequent
time, my sip trace and tcpdump are clearly showing kamailio is still
sending from X.X.X.180:5060.

I have added a lot of debug lines, so I am 100% sure the second call to
force_send_socket is happening.

Am I misusing this module in some way?

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
  

--



Ernest Mavrel
technical support

Novatel d.o.o.
informacijske tehnologije
Mariborska 88, SI - 3000 Celje

tel: +386 (0)82 800 823
fax: +386 (0)82 800 821
mobile: +386 (0)51 436 453
e-mail: ernest.mavrel@novatel.si