Send sr-users mailing list submissions to
       sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
       sr-users-owner@lists.sip-router.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Henrik Aagaard S?rensen)
  2. Re: dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Alex Balashov)
  3. Re: dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Morten Isaksen)
  4. Re: xcap server - http load?balancer: xcap authentication
     problem (laura testi)
  5. Re: bypass rtp traffic. (MingHon)
  6. Re: AVPs missing in onreply_route (Sebastian Damm)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:41:16 +0200
From: Henrik Aagaard S?rensen   <henrikaagaardsorensen@gmail.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Message-ID:
       <CAGH8SebPV=xz1n6Jp=M5fjnUhK0t=Za2aWd_jrpzbjdpdejatw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can call one
number and several different numbers will then be called. The first to pick
up the call gets it.

I've tried to an alias in my dbaliases table in MySQL, but I can only make
it possible to call different numbers for the same user. In a way the other
way around then what I thought.

Is it somehow possible to call one number and then having Kamailio call
several different numbers /users?

As I'm very newbee to Kamailio it would be nice with a more detailed answer,
then perhaps just "Yes, use the module ...".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/5a654b2a/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:43:35 -0400
From: Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Message-ID: <4E1FEFA7.4000001@evaristesys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 07/15/2011 03:41 AM, Henrik Aagaard S?rensen wrote:

> I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can
> call one number and several different numbers will then be called. The
> first to pick up the call gets it.

What do you mean by "user"?  Are you talking about multiple
registrants?  Or are you talking about multiple "numbers" redirected
back out of some PSTN gateway?

--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:48:45 +0200
From: Morten Isaksen <misak@misak.dk>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
       Users   Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Message-ID:
       <CAAyFOkGpzPzDJx+f2NKnsJ5gkz72xZbAKKtCF8ppkenGPPq7iw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Try to look at serial and parallel forking. You can read more at
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.serial_forking

/Morten

2011/7/15 Henrik Aagaard S?rensen <henrikaagaardsorensen@gmail.com>:
> I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can call one
> number and several different numbers will then be called. The first to pick
> up the call gets it.
> I've tried to an alias in my dbaliases table in MySQL, but I can only make
> it possible to call different numbers for the same user. In a way the other
> way around then what I?thought.
> Is it somehow possible to call one number and then having Kamailio call
> several different numbers /users?
> As I'm very newbee to Kamailio it would be nice with a more detailed answer,
> then perhaps just "Yes, use the module ...".
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>



--
Morten Isaksen



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:26:30 +0200
From: laura testi <lau.testi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] xcap server - http load?balancer: xcap
       authentication problem
To: Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt@1und1.de>
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Message-ID:
       <CAHFjjJPY8THunDp+6UPA5m9XZMdkh4t3igQsHb_4G9vp9cChcg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
we have checked the presence extension for DB_MODE only in the master
branch. But it's not complete DB_ONLY mode, it seems that it still uses the
cache for active_watchers in write through mode. Is there any reason for it?
That can still make problem for the scalability for the multiple presence
servers, because if an presence event (either SIP or XCAP) of an active
subscription in the cache of one presence server, goes to another presence
server, can still cause the problem even the DB is sync with the cache.


Best Regards,
Laura

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Henning Westerholt <
henning.westerholt@1und1.de> wrote:

> On Thursday 30 June 2011, laura testi wrote:
> > [...]
> > pres_refresh_watchers triggered by xcap message in another presence
> server:
> > with the hashing over to uri in dispacther workaround, it seems solve the
> > first problem for SIP/SIMPLE messages, but we have the same kind of
> > problem for xcap message. For example, a subscription is in a local cache
> > of one server, and the incomming xcap message related to the same
> > subscription goes to another server, and this message trigger the
> > pres_update_watchers pres_refresh_watchers presence functions from the
> > configuration script in the server where there is no subscription in the
> > local cache, then it send the wrong notify message. This can happen when
> a
> > user add/remove a contact, and the SUBSCRIBE goes to one server and XCAP
> > PUT goes to another server. Unfortunately there is no DB mode only in
> > PRESENCE module like REGISTRAR module. The fallback to db can't help
> > either for point 1 or for point 2. Can you help please?
>
> Hi laura,
>
> i can't comment on the other question, but Marius B did some presence
> extensions in master branch a few month ago, that the presence module now
> supports a db_mode module parameter including DB_ONLY. It will be in
> kamailio
> 3.2, maybe you can have a look to the master branch and backport it, if you
> need it faster.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Henning
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/aa278480/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:36:01 +0800
From: MingHon <gminghon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] bypass rtp traffic.
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Message-ID:
       <CACRMveeJKYnsdBFzqbQPfyoC1uTLaEMUo-F-+MzMReNn9GuWTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

after asterisk reinvite i get status 491: request pending.
after few seconds i hang up both UA then one of the UA will start ring.

please advice.


--

Thanks and Regards,

MingHon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/8f7207c0/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:42:36 +0200
From: Sebastian Damm <damm@sipgate.de>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
       Users   Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Message-ID:
       <CABkWSFzXwLs3tCzL-KLNep6jQ3B6ynNzk23v6qG4PvDL9+gxvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at> wrote:
> The named reply routes are only executed if t_on_reply() was called for
> the request. This reply route will be executed after the default
> reply-route. It is triggered by tm module.

I just inserted a new reply_route, which just prints out some
variables (and does avp_print). From what I see in the logs now, the
named route is executed before the default reply_route. And there are
no AVPs in the named route. Actually, I don't even need the AVPs in
the replies, I need them to be there, when the 200 OK comes in or in
failure route when the call is cancelled. In both cases the AVPs are
<null> if i directly address them.

Any more ideas?

Best regards,
Sebastian



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


End of sr-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 41
****************************************