Hello Daniel,
Sorry, I was thinking that I have already
replied with the result of this required test.
So, I tried with single condition. All fail
(xlog with != is printed) with Request-URI and To-URI which
looks like this: 0[0-9]{9}@sip.domain.tld:
if ($rU=~"^33") {
xlog("L_WARN","RU=33\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","RU!=33\n");
}
if ($rU=~"^0033") {
xlog("L_WARN","RU=0033\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","RU!=0033\n");
}
if ($rU=~"^0[1-9]{9}") {
xlog("L_WARN","RU=06\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","RU!=06\n");
}
if ($rU=~"^\+33") {
xlog("L_WARN","RU=+33\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","RU!=+33\n");
}
if ($tu=~"^sip:33") {
xlog("L_WARN","TU=33\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","TU!=33\n");
}
if ($tu=~"^sip:0033") {
xlog("L_WARN","TU=0033\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","TU!=0033\n");
}
if ($tu=~"^sip:0[1-9]{9}") {
xlog("L_WARN","TU=06\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","TU!=06\n");
}
if ($tu=~"^sip:\+33") {
xlog("L_WARN","TU=+33\n");
} else {
xlog("L_WARN","TU!=+33\n");
}
An example of a log in reply_route:
time=[Thu Feb 5 11:11:07 2015] call
id=[4Yir4nAmR7] call seq=[21] contact
header=[<sip:0612345678@A.B.C.D:5060>] from
uri=[sip:0987654321@sip.domain.tld] from tag=[tZ-n7k92e]
request's method=[INVITE] request's uri=[<null>] to
uri=[sip:0612345678@ sip.domain.tld] to
tag=[a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c84e15e43ea] sip message
id=[1] process id=[14037] ip source=[A.B.C.D] flags=[2],
TU!=06
I'm agree with you: in the case of REPLY, the
Request-URI is null but To URI should match.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards,
Igor.
De :
Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 3 février 2015 12:40
À : Igor Potjevlesch; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
Hello,
I was traveling and had no time for it.
Anyhow, you compare $rU, which is request uri username --
the address in the first line of SIP requests. In the
onreply_routes the SIP reply is processed and $rU is not a
valid value.
I also asked you to see if you can break the expression into
multiple IF with a single condition to see which one fails
-- ie., change from:
if (exp1 || exp2 || ...) {
}
into
if(exp1) {
}
if(exp2) {
}
...
and put log messages to see which one is true or false.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/02/15 12:03,
Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Do you had the opportunity to look at this?
I was thinking to try with () between each
test?
Thank you!
Regards,
Igor.
The To header looks like this (in compact
form):
t:
<sip:0123456789@sip.domain.tld>;tag=f15e211394273201512715012\r\n
Regards,
Igor.
Hello Daniel,
Just to let you, it's in MANAGE_REPLY. Is
that make any difference?
Regards,
Igor.
De :
sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] De
la part de Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Envoyé : mardi 27 janvier 2015 10:32
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
Hello,
can you paste here the SIP message (or at least the To
header and request URI) for such case? I would like to
reproduce.
Also, you can try removing components of the expression in
the second IF one by one to see where it breaks.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/01/15 09:45,
Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I'm very disappointed because of the
following behaviour:
if ($tu=~"^sip:0[1-9]{9}") {
[…]
In that case, Kamailio returns
TRUE because the instructions in the block are executed.
}
if ($rU=~"^33" || $rU=~"^0033" ||
$rU=~"^0[1-9]{9}" || $rU=~"^\+33" || $tu=~"^sip:33" || $tu=~"^sip:0033" || $tu=~"^sip:0[1-9]{9}" || $tu=~"^sip:\+33" ) {
[…]
In that case, Kamailio should return FALSE
because the instructions in the block are not executed.
}
Am I missed something regarding 'OR' ?
Regards,
Igor.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda