On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel@voice-system.ro> wrote:

Hello,

On 03/21/07 20:14, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a
> better performance.
>
> A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS runs on
> a 64 bit machine. Was the compilation done to generate a 64 bit
> executable?
yes, it was 64bit executable. OS is Debian amd64.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Sergio Gutierrez
>
> On 3/21/07, *Sergio Gutierrez* <saguti@gmail.com
> <mailto:saguti@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Daniel.
>
>     Thanks for your answer.
>
>     My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my UAS, as
>     described is another instance of Openser.
>
>     I will try what you sugest.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     Sergio Gutiérrez.
>
>
>     On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* < daniel@voice-system.ro
>     <mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>> wrote:
>
>         Hello,
>
>         do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS is another
>         openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas
>         scenario?
>
>         First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very simple
>         config
>         with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start
>         sipp. See
>         what results you get and that should be the reference for sipp
>         capacity.
>         Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different
>         servers, see
>         if you get the cumulative value better.
>
>         The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel execution of
>         openser processes has some impact as well.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Daniel
>
>
>         On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
>         > Hi.
>         >
>         > Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire T2000
>         running
>         > Solaris 10.
>         > Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC
>         Systems, and
>         > used the recommended settings to generate accurate code for my
>         > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance
>         tests are
>         > just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
>         >
>         > My setup is the following:
>         >
>         > Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC T1 1.2
>         GHZ 6 Core.
>         > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC
>         III+ 900 Mhz
>         > Software versions listed as on the webpage.
>         >
>         > openser -V output:
>         > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
>         > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
>         > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC,
>         FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
>         > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
>         MAX_LISTEN 16,
>         > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>         > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
>         > svnrevision: unknown
>         > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
>         > main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
>         >
>         >
>         > I would thank any idea about how could I improve the
>         performnace of my
>         > setup. I think that because of the hardware specifications,
>         the result
>         > should be at least equal than listed.
>         >
>         > Thanks in advance.
>         >
>         > Kind regards.
>         >
>         > Sergio Gutiérrez.
>         >
>         > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Users mailing list
>         > Users@openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
>         > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>         >
>
>
>