Hello,

from the log, the alias should be in r-uri unless there is a strict record router somewhere. You should post here the sip trace from invite to ack to look at the signaling.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 8/26/13 7:50 PM, Marc Soda wrote:
(Sorry for the double post)

I trying to debug why Kamailio is dropping certain ACKs.  I have debug level set to 4 and cfgtrace on.  The last thing I see in the log for my missing ACKs is:

Aug 26 12:22:29 eng-reg1 kamailio: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=789 a=16 n=if
Aug 26 12:22:29 eng-reg1 kamailio: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=786 a=25 n=check_route_param
Aug 26 12:22:29 eng-reg1 kamailio: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:974]: check_route_param(): params are <;alias=172.16.3.65~5060~1>
Aug 26 12:22:29 eng-reg1 kamailio: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=795 a=16 n=if

Which corresponds to these lines in the config:

        if (!(isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB))) {
                return;
        }

        if (is_request()) {            <---------LINE 795
                if (!has_totag()) {
                        if(t_is_branch_route()) {
                                add_rr_param(";nat=yes");
                        }
                }
        }

Why would that be the last line that is traced?  Is Kamailio really not processing past here?

--

Marc



_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Oct 21-24; Miami, Nov 11-13, 2013
  - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -