Right Waldo, Vovida's one is unusable and buggy.

For myself, I use asterisk B2bua, it works well and the developper quick answer your request.

Olivier

Waldo Rubinstein a écrit :
If you don't mind me asking, which b2bua are you using? I hear vovida's b2bua is old and obsolote, so I'm just wondering if there is a newer one or which are you using.

Thanks,
Waldo

On Mar 25, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Chia-Hung Hsu wrote:


Dear All,
      I am new in SER and B2BUA, and I have a problem now
   
UA1----SER----B2BUA----Freeradius
                |
                |
             UA2
 
if i use the configure in b2bua-cfg.xml
<Billing_Server>
       <Address>radius.xxx.com</Address>
       <Authentication_Port>1813</Authentication_Port>
       <Accounting_Port>1813</Accounting_Port>
       <Password>password</Password>
</Billing_Server>
 
it will show the log in the radius server, when UA1 called to UA2
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 140.110.20.55:1024, id=0, length=68
Authentication-Request sent to a non-authentication port from client b2bua:1024 - ID 0 : IGNORED
 
so , i change the configure in b2bua-cfg.xml
<Billing_Server>
       <Address>radius.xxx.com</Address>
       <Authentication_Port>1812</Authentication_Port>
       <Accounting_Port>1813</Accounting_Port>
       <Password>password</Password>
</Billing_Server>
 
when UA1 called to UA2 , caller show the log "Number does not exist Call rejected : 404 not found"
Can anyone help me?
 
John Hsu
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers


_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers