sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

11 participants
37462 discussions

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute... Do I almost have it???
by Douglas Garstang 28 Mar '08

28 Mar '08

Ok... I can do it if I use cr_user_rewrite_uri("sip:.*@192.168.1.240", "1") in openser.cfg and then change the username from blank to '.*' (WHERE is that documented?? I only worked it out by tracing port 3306!!!). But... this isn't feesible. This means that I have to HARD CODE the name of the user in the openser.cfg... Doug. ----- Original Message ---- From: Douglas Garstang <dougmig33(a)yahoo.com> To: Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:41:23 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute... Do I almost have it??? Ovidiu, Ok, so now it's routing but it's not selecting the carrier by matching the source IP address in the subscriber table against the IP address of the incoming INVITE. Is that even possible? If it's not possible, how do I have a different routing table for each OpenSER system? I was going to use my carrier as my OpenSER instance.... that would have worked... I have these tables... mysql> select * from carrierroute; +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ | id | carrier | scan_prefix | domain | prob | strip | rewrite_host | rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | comment | +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.1 | | | NULL | | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.2 | | | NULL | | 5 | 0 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.3 | | | NULL | | 9 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.1 | | | NULL | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.2 | | | NULL | | 11 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.3 | | | NULL | +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ 6 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from route_tree; +----+-----------+ | id | carrier | +----+-----------+ | 1 | Hong Kong | | 0 | default | | 2 | San Jose | +----+-----------+ mysql> select username, domain, cr_preferred_carrier from subscriber; +----------+----------------+----------------------+ | username | domain | cr_preferred_carrier | +----------+----------------+----------------------+ | | 192.168.255.53 | 2 | | | 192.168.1.240 | 1 | +----------+----------------+----------------------+ ----- Original Message ---- From: Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> To: Douglas Garstang <dougmig33(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de>; users(a)lists.openser.org Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:56:15 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute... Do I almost have it??? On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Douglas Garstang <dougmig33(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >I am using this module in production with more then 400k routes loaded > >for 8 different providers and it is working like a charm. > >As Henning mentioned, the interface is a little bit cumbersome but usable. > >You can put all the carriers under the same table and prioritize the > >gateway based on domains. Like tis you don't need to hardcode > >anything in the config file. > > > >Carrierroute was designed to deal with a big amount of routing rules > >and it is doing an amazing job. > >LCR was designed to deal with a limited number of routes/gateways but > >it has a different level of flexibility and a more mature interface. > > > >Carrierroute is a brand new module and for sure it will improve in > >flexibility as times go by (just like the lcr did along releases). > > Ovidiu (or anyone else....) > > I think I may almost have it..... If I treat all routes as being in the same > carrier, I can just use cr_rewrite_uri("1","call_id"), and then > cr_rewrite_uri("2","call_id") in failure_route[1] and > cr_rewrite_uri("2","call_id") in failure_route[2], correct? I tested this > and it seems to work. I guess it's up to me then to populate the > rewrite_host column with a gateway belonging to the cheapest carrier for > domain 1, the a gateway from the next cheapest carrier for domain 2 and so > on. Still sound right? finally you got it ;) > Here's where it gets a bit tricky. We have OpenSER running in 6 different > locations. The gateways we use will differ for each location (we always want > to use the closest gateway belonging to a carrier). So, I figured I could > use the 'user' functionality in carrierroute to do this. I could simply put > the domain (IP address) in the domain column, leave the user blank (we don't > have users... calls are forwarded from asterisk), and then associate a > carrier in the cr_preferred_carrier column. You can see all that in my > subscriber table below. > > Doesn't seem to work though. When routing a call, OpenSER complains that it > can't find a default carrier, and then because it seems not to match the > incoming call against an entry in the subscriber table, it can't find a > carrier to use, and fails the call. add a 'default' carrier into the route_tree table > So... how would I be able to use the source IP address of the asterisk box > that sends the calls to OpenSER in the subscriber table so that I could have > different routing entries for each OpenSER system??? > > Here's my db tables... > > > mysql> select * from route_tree; > +----+-----------+ > | id | carrier | > +----+-----------+ > | 1 | Hong Kong | > | 0 | San Jose | > +----+-----------+ > > mysql> select * from carrierroute order by carrier, scan_prefix, domain; > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > | id | carrier | scan_prefix | domain | prob | strip | rewrite_host | > rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | comment | > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.1 | > | | NULL | > | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.2 | > | | NULL | > | 5 | 0 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.3 | > | | NULL | > | 9 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.1 | > | | NULL | > | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.2 | > | | NULL | > | 11 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.3 | > | | NULL | > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > > mysql> select id, username, domain, cr_preferred_carrier from subscriber; > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > | id | username | domain | cr_preferred_carrier | > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > | 1 | | 192.168.255.53 | 0 | > | 2 | | 192.168.255.54 | 1 | > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > > > > > > > ________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now. Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER and radiusclient-ng [Unknown Attribute]
by Krom 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

Parallel posting this to both CDRTool users and OpenSER users, so apologies to members of both. I have installed the latest version of CDRTool and running it with OpenSER 1.1.1 for the time being. When looking at the tcpdump of the records leaving the OpenSER server via radiusclient-ng I am viewing a few 'Unknown Attribute' statements. Ex: Accounting Status Attribute (40), length: 6, Value: Start Service Type Attribute (6), length: 6, Value: #15 Unknown Attribute (102), length: 6, Value: Unknown Attribute (101), length: 6, Value: Username Attribute (1), length: 26, Value: +15552221111(a)x.x.x.x Calling Station Attribute (31), length: 24, Value: sip:+15552221111@x.x.x.x Called Station Attribute (30), length: 32, Value: sip:+15553334444@x.x.x.x Unknown Attribute (107), length: 35, Value: Accounting Session ID Attribute (44), length: 14, Value: 0d487415(a)mysipserver.com Unknown Attribute (104), length: 10, Value: Unknown Attribute (105), length: 7, Value: Unknown Attribute (103), length: 6, Value: Unknown Attribute (214), length: 15, Value: Unknown Attribute (215), length: 6, Value: Unknown Attribute (216), length: 32, Value: Event Timestamp Attribute (55), length: 6, Value: Thu Mar 27 11:01:23 2008 NAS IP Address Attribute (4), length: 6, Value: x.x.x.x NAS Port Attribute (5), length: 6, Value: 5060 Accounting Delay Attribute (41), length: 6, Value: 00 secs I have looked into the dictionary.ser and each of the Attributes are defined and the dictionary file that is defined in radiusclient.conf has the $INCLUDE dictionary.ser statement. Any hints, ideas or links would be appreciated. -- -- Krom kyle.romulas(a)gmail.com

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Rewriting the to header
by shiebar＠post.tau.ac.il 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

Hi, Who is inchage of replacing the to header in the message (openser/wesip)? When wesip get the message the to uri is still with the openser IP. Do I need to do something when the request is INVITE request or these openser replace it automatically before he send it to wesip? Please advice. I realy need it soon. Thanks in advance, Shie

3 9

[OpenSER-Users] URI Length
by VoIP Forums www.Go4Calls.com 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

Hi All, How i can get the length of called number. i am trying to making routing logic base on length. Please help us how i can get the length i tried the fillowing but did not work. if (uri:len<=7) { rewritehostport("192.168.1.1:5060"); route(1); exit; }; Regards, www.Go4Calls.Com VoIP Forums _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=…

2 1

[Serusers] 转发： SER performance bottleneck ?
by fang, tian 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

-------原始邮件------- 发件人： fang, tian 日期： 2008-3-27 12:59:27 收件人： serusers(a)iptel.org 主题： SER performance bottleneck ? Hi dear friends, We tried to benchmarking IPtel SER 0.9.6 on Intel xeon CPU based computer recently,but we met a problem about poort performance.For example on a computer configured with Intel 2*sossaman CPU (four cores)+2G ddr2-400 memory+100M Ethernet card, we didn't configure any database,and registered with only 1-2 users,and we use SIPP 3.0 as the call generator ,but we can only see about 3,000 calls per second for a very simply built-in scenario in SIPP(UAC+UAS),and the CPU idle percentage is about 70-80%.if we tried to increase the call rate ,we got failure calls. We tried to enlarge the memory to 768M for SER,and limited the ser processes number on each port from 8 to 4,and we also made some improvement on config.h & Makefile.defs,but didn't get big improvement on performance . If anybody could help me on this,I will appreciate a lot. Thanks Fang tian.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] tm module fails if RURI is not a SIP URI
by Klaus Darilion 26 Mar '08

26 Mar '08

Hi! I just tried if openser can handle a service URN in the request URI (e.g. urn:service:sos which is used for emergency calls (refer to IETF ECRIT WG)). Do it stateless with forward() works fine. Doing it statefull with tm module and t_relay() fails: DBG:tm:t_newtran: transaction on entrance=(nil) DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=78 DBG:tm:t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=20823, isACK=0 DBG:tm:matching_3261: RFC3261 transaction matching failed DBG:tm:t_lookup_request: no transaction found ERROR:core:parse_uri: bad uri, state 0 parsed: <urn:> (4) / <urn:service:sos> (15) ERROR:core:parse_sip_msg_uri: bad uri <urn:service:sos> DBG:core:set_err_info: ec: 1, el: 3, ei: 'error parsing r-uri' ERROR:tm:new_t: uri invalid ERROR:tm:t_newtran: new_t failed I wonder, is it really necessary for the tm module to understand the syntax of the RURI? Of course it is necessary if routing is done based on the RURI. But if DURI is set, or t_relay("udp:1.2.3.4:5060") is used, then I think it should work with any uri scheme in RURI. regards klaus

2 2

[Serusers] ser with asterisk
by aka 26 Mar '08

26 Mar '08

i want to integrate ser with asterisk.i try to do that in one box.asteriskwill communicate 5060 port and ser will communicate 6070 port.two servers work fine in seperatley.but i want to integrate the asterisk and ser in same machine.please give me some help for this iam very beginner for this. thanx akalanka

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] automatically generated aliases with usrloc and ldap
by Lukasz Stelmach 26 Mar '08

26 Mar '08

Greetings All. I have managed to set up OpenSER with LDAP authentication. Now I would like it to create memory cached aliases each time a user registers. I do not wan to use any persistent storage because I have it already it is my LDAP directory. However, I would like OpenSER to cache those aliases as doing ldap lookup for every message does not look too apealing to me. Let me explain how I see it: if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if(is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) { if (!ldap_search("ldap://sipaccounts/ou=dept,o=TELMARK,c=PL?uid,mail,uidNumber,userPassword?one?(uid=$f)) { #error handling } ldap_result("uid/$avp(s:username)"); ldap_result("userPassword/$avp(s:password)"); ldap_result("mail/$avp(s:longalias)"); ldap_result("uidNumber/$avp(s:numalias)"); if(pv_proxy_authorize("telmark")) { proxy_challenge("telmark", "1"); exit; } } else { proxy_challenge("telmark", "1"); exit; } if(!save("location")) sl_reply_error(); # And here the big thing! } What to do to make save("aliases"); (called twice) save uidNumber and mail (without @domain, these are transformations, I know) as aliases in usrloc? PS. Please cc answers I am not a subscriber. -- Best regards, >Łukasz<

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute... Do I almost have it???
by Douglas Garstang 26 Mar '08

26 Mar '08

Ovidiu, Ok, so now it's routing but it's not selecting the carrier by matching the source IP address in the subscriber table against the IP address of the incoming INVITE. Is that even possible? If it's not possible, how do I have a different routing table for each OpenSER system? I was going to use my carrier as my OpenSER instance.... that would have worked... I have these tables... mysql> select * from carrierroute; +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ | id | carrier | scan_prefix | domain | prob | strip | rewrite_host | rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | comment | +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.1 | | | NULL | | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.2 | | | NULL | | 5 | 0 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.3 | | | NULL | | 9 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.1 | | | NULL | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.2 | | | NULL | | 11 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.3 | | | NULL | +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ 6 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from route_tree; +----+-----------+ | id | carrier | +----+-----------+ | 1 | Hong Kong | | 0 | default | | 2 | San Jose | +----+-----------+ mysql> select username, domain, cr_preferred_carrier from subscriber; +----------+----------------+----------------------+ | username | domain | cr_preferred_carrier | +----------+----------------+----------------------+ | | 192.168.255.53 | 2 | | | 192.168.1.240 | 1 | +----------+----------------+----------------------+ ----- Original Message ---- From: Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> To: Douglas Garstang <dougmig33(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de>; users(a)lists.openser.org Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:56:15 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Carrierroute... Do I almost have it??? On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Douglas Garstang <dougmig33(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >I am using this module in production with more then 400k routes loaded > >for 8 different providers and it is working like a charm. > >As Henning mentioned, the interface is a little bit cumbersome but usable. > >You can put all the carriers under the same table and prioritize the > >gateway based on domains. Like tis you don't need to hardcode > >anything in the config file. > > > >Carrierroute was designed to deal with a big amount of routing rules > >and it is doing an amazing job. > >LCR was designed to deal with a limited number of routes/gateways but > >it has a different level of flexibility and a more mature interface. > > > >Carrierroute is a brand new module and for sure it will improve in > >flexibility as times go by (just like the lcr did along releases). > > Ovidiu (or anyone else....) > > I think I may almost have it..... If I treat all routes as being in the same > carrier, I can just use cr_rewrite_uri("1","call_id"), and then > cr_rewrite_uri("2","call_id") in failure_route[1] and > cr_rewrite_uri("2","call_id") in failure_route[2], correct? I tested this > and it seems to work. I guess it's up to me then to populate the > rewrite_host column with a gateway belonging to the cheapest carrier for > domain 1, the a gateway from the next cheapest carrier for domain 2 and so > on. Still sound right? finally you got it ;) > Here's where it gets a bit tricky. We have OpenSER running in 6 different > locations. The gateways we use will differ for each location (we always want > to use the closest gateway belonging to a carrier). So, I figured I could > use the 'user' functionality in carrierroute to do this. I could simply put > the domain (IP address) in the domain column, leave the user blank (we don't > have users... calls are forwarded from asterisk), and then associate a > carrier in the cr_preferred_carrier column. You can see all that in my > subscriber table below. > > Doesn't seem to work though. When routing a call, OpenSER complains that it > can't find a default carrier, and then because it seems not to match the > incoming call against an entry in the subscriber table, it can't find a > carrier to use, and fails the call. add a 'default' carrier into the route_tree table > So... how would I be able to use the source IP address of the asterisk box > that sends the calls to OpenSER in the subscriber table so that I could have > different routing entries for each OpenSER system??? > > Here's my db tables... > > > mysql> select * from route_tree; > +----+-----------+ > | id | carrier | > +----+-----------+ > | 1 | Hong Kong | > | 0 | San Jose | > +----+-----------+ > > mysql> select * from carrierroute order by carrier, scan_prefix, domain; > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > | id | carrier | scan_prefix | domain | prob | strip | rewrite_host | > rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | comment | > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.1 | > | | NULL | > | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.2 | > | | NULL | > | 5 | 0 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 200.1.1.3 | > | | NULL | > | 9 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.1 | > | | NULL | > | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.2 | > | | NULL | > | 11 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100.1.1.3 | > | | NULL | > +----+---------+-------------+--------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+---------+ > > mysql> select id, username, domain, cr_preferred_carrier from subscriber; > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > | id | username | domain | cr_preferred_carrier | > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > | 1 | | 192.168.255.53 | 0 | > | 2 | | 192.168.255.54 | 1 | > +----+----------+----------------+----------------------+ > > > > > > > ________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

1 0

[Serusers] [SPAM] Re: pls. help me on my installation
by Martin Hoffmann 26 Mar '08

26 Mar '08

Spam detection software, running on the system "h1063274.serverkompetenz.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ram wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Allan Jardinel <ajardinel2002(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > I'm using ubuntu 7.10 and install ser 0.9.7 and rtp, after the > > installation i test and it can call both users, when i try to restart the > > computer xten can not register anymore so i check the settings and its ok. > > but when i check the /var/run/ser.pid there is no file, also the > > /tmp/ser_fifo has no file so restart the ser using the /etc/ser restart or > > force-reload but still pid and fifo has no file. pls. help me to solve this > > problem.... > > > > > Hi > > you try run manuall with > > ser -c -f config file > > see you see any errrors [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 2.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.218.12.224 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users