From a.kabihno@dynatech.lv Tue Jun 13 11:57:15 2023 From: Arsenijs Kabihno To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Cannot achieve rtpengine HA Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:56:48 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CPAXP190MB1582DF7F5366170BAF3EC90A9B55A=40PAXP190MB?= =?utf-8?q?1582=2EEURP190=2EPROD=2EOUTLOOK=2ECOM=3E?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0054770373==" --===============0054770373== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, thank you! Probably the subject of this email is slightly misleading, the actual issue t= hat we have is that kamailio sticks to the rtpengine node selected in the beg= inning of the call. If rtpengine node goes down and there are active calls, kamailio continues to= try to communicate with it, when it is already inactive: Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) ERROR: {2 3 INVITE = jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3070]: send_rtpp_command(): can'= t send command "offer" to RTPEngine Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 54(60) INFO: {1 3 ACK jdl9= kq6fv51jcv1agk2e}