sr-users December 2024

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

27 participants
34 discussions

segmentation fault when assigning xavp to another xavp (trying to stack them)
by Benoit Panizzon 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hi version: kamailio 5.7.6 (x86_64/linux) on Ubuntu from the: http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57 repository AOR alice has 4 contacts with q=0.5 AOR bob has 1 contact with q=0.5 I can reproduce a crash with this code snipplet: xavp_rm("contact_stack"); # Make sure XAVP does not exist. lookup("location", "sip:alice@example.com"); t_load_contacts(0); # after this, $xavp(tm_contacts) has four elements $xavp(contact_stack) = $xavp(tm_contacts); # Store the four elements on my stack # Verify, $xavp(contact_stack) now has four elements, copy successfull. lookup("location", "sip:bob@example.com"); # after this, $xavp(tm_contacts) has one element $xavp(tm_contacts) = $xavp(contact_stack); # Append the four previously saved contact with the one in $xavp(tm_contacts) if (!t_next_contacts()) { xlog("L_INFO", "$cfg(route): ERROR NO CONTACTS LOADED \n"); sl_send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error - Cannot get contacts"); } # Load contacts into destination set to parallel fork to five contacts. => segmentation fault! Shall I open an issue on github or am I performing a forbidden action? I'm doing some more test to find out where exactly the crash occurs. I'm not sure if it happens when adding to tm_contacts of when calling t_next_contacts. Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

2 1

uneven load distribution after gw goes down?
by David Villasmil 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hello guys, I'm seeing the dispatcher module used with ds_select_dst($avp(dsdst), "0") is distributing the calls to a failing gw, to the next available gw instead of distributing it. When a gw fails and has been marked as inactive, shouldn't it be taken out of the list and the list recomputed? is this not the case? Thanks all Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com

2 2

Updated: Online devel meeting on matrix - 15:00 UTC, Dec 9, 2024
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hello, we should consider an online devel meeting sometime soon to summarize what was done at (and still needs to be done after) devel meeting in Dusseldorf and plan a bit the targets for next major release 6.0. If considered useful, I propose Dec 9, 2024 (Monday) at 15:00UTC (16:00 Berlin/Paris/Madrid/Rome), but we can also look for other dates as well. Topics to be discussed can be added at: - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio-wiki/blob/main/docs/devel/irc-meetings… Pull requests can be made by users without git access. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 2

WS and rtpengine_manage
by Knserbrave 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hi Kamailio Community, When testing rtpengine_manage and websockets, I noticed that if the rtpengine table in the database is not used, a new websocket is created for every call for a given dialog. That is, when an INVITE is received, an offer is sent to rtpengine. When the 200 OK or 18[3|0] is received, an answer is sent. However, the WS identifier often changes and as a result the request is not sent over the same websocket. This is problematic particularly when using FQDNs in the Kamailio configuration. When a load balancer is used between Kamailio and rtpengine, the answer may arrive at a different rtpengine in the cluster. After tracing through the source, I could not find a configuration parameter or set of triggers that I could manipulate to fix this. It leads me to believe it is only possible to reuse the websocket when the rtpengine table is used. Does anybody have more experience than I in this area that may be able to point me in the right direction, making load balancers for rtpengine_manage calls possible?

3 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2024