that&#39;s what i ended up doing :)<br>
thanks for the confirmation &amp; testing<br>
<br>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Ovidiu Sas &lt;notifications@github.com&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Just like we have PROC_SIPRPC, maybe we should have PROC_GENERICWORKER.<br>
&gt; The PROC_GENERICWORKER could be an alias to PROC_SIPRPC and then all<br>
&gt; workers should be initialized with the same rank and there will be no hard<br>
&gt; coding (the +1).<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I tested this and it&#39;s working.<br>
&gt; My initial test was done with modparam(&quot;kazoo&quot;, &quot;pua_mode&quot;, 0) and it<br>
&gt; didn&#39;t catch the db non initialization issue of the &quot;AMQP Consumer Worker&quot; .<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Also, having the new PROC_GENERICWORKER would solve all the other<br>
&gt; hardcoded places in other modules.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; —<br>
&gt; You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.<br>
&gt; Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<br>
&gt; &lt;https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/972#issuecomment-278432817&gt;,<br>
&gt; or mute the thread<br>
&gt; &lt;https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAvDrHh5Z5o-Es7FjnTx0FR0blDPUVAOks5rahVzgaJpZM4L5phZ&gt;<br>
&gt; .<br>
&gt;<br>


<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/972#issuecomment-278433548">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZbLU0No-LhEOuRN56XpbJrt3V8llks5rahYYgaJpZM4L5phZ">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AF36ZS5f0iTbtGlRMf2Iy33DqMqyMFmsks5rahYYgaJpZM4L5phZ.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/972#issuecomment-278433548"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/kamailio/kamailio","title":"kamailio/kamailio","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@lazedo in #972: that's what i ended up doing :)\nthanks for the confirmation \u0026 testing\n\nOn Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Ovidiu Sas \u003cnotifications@github.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Just like we have PROC_SIPRPC, maybe we should have PROC_GENERICWORKER.\n\u003e The PROC_GENERICWORKER could be an alias to PROC_SIPRPC and then all\n\u003e workers should be initialized with the same rank and there will be no hard\n\u003e coding (the +1).\n\u003e\n\u003e I tested this and it's working.\n\u003e My initial test was done with modparam(\"kazoo\", \"pua_mode\", 0) and it\n\u003e didn't catch the db non initialization issue of the \"AMQP Consumer Worker\" .\n\u003e\n\u003e Also, having the new PROC_GENERICWORKER would solve all the other\n\u003e hardcoded places in other modules.\n\u003e\n\u003e —\n\u003e You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.\n\u003e Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/972#issuecomment-278432817\u003e,\n\u003e or mute the thread\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAvDrHh5Z5o-Es7FjnTx0FR0blDPUVAOks5rahVzgaJpZM4L5phZ\u003e\n\u003e .\n\u003e\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/972#issuecomment-278433548"}}}</script>