@NGSegovia - it is what I asked in my first comments, based on what I saw in the code.

But the last backtrace shows also URI field being invalid, so maybe the ka structure is compromised/overwritten -- like already freed/destroyed while the keepalive was ongoing, and another process got the memory zone and wrote there. That's why I asked to see if the destination is eventually removed from the KA list. I am not the developer of the module, but does not look like there is a protection for this case (provided that destinations can be removed at any time)...

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.