All,

These are good comments and very helpful.  In response, …

The naming decision came up early in the design process and I concluded that queue is too generic.  I thought of “callqueue” but decided against it since there are many ways to put calls into queues and I didn’t want to conflict with future modules which might have their own “call queues”.  I used “mohqueue” because it is concise and hopefully makes the function more apparent.  I could call it “MOHqueue” if that makes the “MOH” part stand out more.

Using the payload number was not my choice but is the way Sippy RTPproxy works.  Like others, (http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-July/069391.html) I found this out by going directly into the source code.  If I am wrong in this conclusion, please help me get it right.

Being able to choose a specific call out of queue is very flexible, but under what circumstances would this feature be useful?

xavp is a useful extension and something to consider for the future.  I was in a hurry to meet deadlines so I chose what worked best in the current environment.

I will adjust the comment about request routes.  I appreciate the help with documentation since it is just as important as the code.

Thanks,
Bob