Hi Daniel,
This issue might be related to #679 and #752.
On a "A endpoint" --- Kamailio ---- "B endpoint" scenario with track_cseq_updates enabled, I am having this issue:
A sends INVITE with CSeq 101, Kamailio forwards it and gets 407 from B.
Kamailio makes the SIP Auth with CSeq 102 using uac_auth.
A sends a within-dialog transaction with Cseq 102.
Kamailio does not mangle the Cseq (although it adds P-K-CSeq-Refresh: 103 header).
B sends 200 OK with Cseq 102.
Kamailio mangles it and forwards it to A with Cseq 101 (that doesn't match the expected CSeq).
I have tested both in master branch (commit d150d5a) and 4.4 branch (commit 5a21952).
I send you a pcap to your gmail account so that you can see what I mean :)
Thank you and tell me please if you need more testing!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.