Victor Seva writes:

> @juha-h since you committed https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6822ff45e931ad3e93b22ebf7d1beb350bf27e70, can you please comment why it was necessary?

I don't remember. It was long time ago. Perhaps there has been some
mailing list discussion related to the commit.

> Why on PUA_DB_ONLY there's no call to ``get_record_puadb``
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6822ff45e931ad3e93b22ebf7d1beb350bf27e70#diff-0c68f4211a54ae66988228c3e4b61852R521-R528

There is call to ``get_record_puadb``:

```
if (dbmode==PUA_DB_ONLY)
{
if (publ->etag) {
memset(&dbpres, 0, sizeof(dbpres));
dbpres.pres_uri = &pres_uri;
dbpres.watcher_uri = &watcher_uri;
dbpres.extra_headers = &extra_headers;
presentity = get_record_puadb(publ->id, publ->etag,
&dbpres, &res);
}
}
```

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.