Sorry first patch was missing a lock that was required

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Julien Chavanton <jchavanton@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Folks,

We faced a deadlock caused by acquiring the same lock twice in src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c

dmq_ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor);
>> lock_get(_d->table[sl].lock);
get_urecord_by_ruid
>> lock_ulslot(_d, sl);
>>>> lock_get(_d->table[i].lock);


The attached fix will not lock until get_urecord_by_ruid as returned.


Regards
Julien