Hey Ovidiu
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas@voipembedded.com> wrote:
If the headers must be accessible by several modules, then it would
make sense to have them into existing framework.
One option would be to enable some compile flags and compile that code
only for IMS (similar to FLAVOUR - we could add a new flavour)
don't know if I would go so far as to call it another 'flavour' (semantically), but yes compile flags may be the way to go......
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I wanted to ask the community what the best way forward is for incorporating
> new SIP (IMS specific) headers into Kamailio. Right now I see two ways:
> 1. incorporating into existing parser framework in Kamailio
> 2. Leave it up to individual modules to independently parse for appropriate
> IMS headers.
> I would think 1 would be the best option?
> Here are some examples of the extension headers:
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Communications_Platform/5.0/html/SIP_Servlets_Server_User_Guide/sect-SIP_and_IMS_Extensions.html#tab-IMS_P-Header_Extensions
> Cheers
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda