Also, for now we will not have time to document the library, but this will not be necessary from a user's perspective.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Daniel,

we are going to put the IMS extensions in this week so we are working on the docs at the moment. However, one quick question:

1. We have used a library of accessors (things we do across various modules) for IMS-specific stuff for example, ims_get_impu, etc. Are you okay with us adding another library called "ims", similar to kcore, kmi, etc?

Cheers
Jason