On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eugene Oden <eugeneoden+list@gmail.com> wrote:

one more clue:

767 if(sp_dest->setf(msg, &sp_dest->pvp, (int)EQ_T, &val)<0)

(gdb) p sp_dest->setf

$1 = (pv_setf_t) 0xffffffff

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Eugene Oden <eugeneoden+list@gmail.com> wrote:

hello,

just started using the dialog module with kamailio 3.1.0 and getting segfaults whenever get_profile_size() is executed. here's a stack trace:

Core was generated by `kamailio'.

Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.

#0 0x003c729e in w_get_profile_size (msg=0x834d8b4, profile=0xb60823f8 "\224$\b\266\t", value=0x831cb40 "\004",

   result=0x8340900 "\001") at dialog.c:767

767 if(sp_dest->setf(msg, &sp_dest->pvp, (int)EQ_T, &val)<0)

(gdb) bt

#0 0x003c729e in w_get_profile_size (msg=0x834d8b4, profile=0xb60823f8 "\224$\b\266\t", value=0x831cb40 "\004",

   result=0x8340900 "\001") at dialog.c:767

#1 0x08057770 in do_action (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x8328f2c, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1105

#2 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x8328f2c, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553

#3 0x080576c0 in do_action (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x832c794, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:711

#4 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x832c794, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553

#5 0x0805ed71 in run_actions_safe (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832c794, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1605

#6 0x080f5d44 in rval_get_int (h=0xbff606e8, msg=0x0, i=0xbff600d8, rv=0xbff5f694, cache=0x0) at rvalue.c:904

#7 0x080fb4fb in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbff606e8, msg=0x834d8b4, res=0xbff600d8, rve=0x832c9c4) at rvalue.c:1866

#8 0x080fb5d0 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbff606e8, msg=0x834d8b4, res=0xbff60394, rve=0x832cdac) at rvalue.c:1873

#9 0x08057511 in do_action (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832db7c, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1069

#10 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832be40, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553

#11 0x080576c0 in do_action (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x8313b88, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:711

#12 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x83003cc, msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553

#13 0x0805ecf4 in run_top_route (a=0x83003cc, msg=0x834d8b4, c=0x0) at action.c:1626

#14 0x080dceab in receive_msg (

   buf=0x82a7740 "INVITE sip:*98@pipeline.bbpsphone.net SIP/2.0\r\nCall-ID: 6fb1466b73075c7ad55f278f86ff6b27@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0\r\nCSeq: 2 INVITE\r\nFrom: \"Eugene Oden\" <sip:goden.atl1@pipeline.bbpsphone.net>;tag=56dc2460\r\nTo: "..., len=1538, rcv_info=0xbff608f8)

   at receive.c:205

#15 0x0816eef7 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:532

#16 0x080ad9e1 in main_loop () at main.c:1554

#17 0x080b1126 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbff60bd4) at main.c:2398

and the relevant bits of configuration - not sure if its correct:

...

loadmodule "dialog.so"

modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4);

modparam("dialog", "profiles_no_value", "voicemail");

...

route {

   ...

   if (is_method("INVITE")) {

   dlg_manage();

   setflag(4);

   }

   ...

   if (! route(LIMIT_VOICEMAIL)) {

   xdbg(" SCRIPT: Voicemail limit exceeded\n");

   sl_send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable");

   exit;

   }

   ...

}

...

route[LIMIT_VOICEMAIL] {

   get_profile_size("voicemail", "$avp(size)");

   if ($avp(size) >= 1) {

   return -1;

   }

   set_dlg_profile("voicemail");

   return 1;

}

any thoughts?

gene